CHIGNIK TO RESURRECTION BAY SALMON STATISTICS 
651 
Table 3. — Graphic table of catches of coho salmon in the Chignik district 
[See Table 2 for explanation. Each letter in this table represents a catch of 2,000 fish] 
Year 
Catch 
1910. 
1911. 
1912 
1913. 
1914. 
1915. 
1916. 
1917. 
1918. 
1919. 
1920. 
1921. 
1922. 
1923. 
1924. 
1925. 
1926. 
1927. 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 
BBBB 
BBBBBBBBBB 
BBBBBBBBBBBB 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 
BBBBBBBAG 
BBBBBBBBBBAA 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBAAAAAA 
BBBBBBBBBBBA 
BBBBBBB 
BBBBBBBB 
BBBBBBBBBB 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBAE 
BBBBBBBBBBAAA A A AE 
BBBBBBA AAAAA AAAAEE 
BBBBBBBB B BBBBBBB BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBA A AAA EEEO 
Considering the Chignik district as a whole the catch of chums, as shown in Figure 
4, gradually increased until about 1918 and has since maintained a fairly constant 
level. Table 4, however, shows that this level has been maintained by large catches 
made at Aniakchak, Hook, and Kujulik Bays particularly in 1926 and 1927. The 
average annual catch in Chignik Bay alone was approximately twice as great during 
the period from 1918 to 1922, inclusive, as it has been at any time since. It is prob- 
able, however, that the regulations have affected the catch of chums as they did the 
catch of reds so that the lowered productivity since 1922 can not be taken as evi- 
dence of depletion. 
Table 4. — Graphic table of catches of chum salmon in the Chignik district 
[See Table 2 for explanation. Each letter in this table lepresents a catch of 5,000 fish] 
1910. 
1911. 
1912. 
1913. 
1914. 
1915. 
1916. 
1917. 
1918. 
1919. 
1920. 
1921. 
1922. 
1923. 
1924. 
1925. 
1926. 
1927. 
Year 
Catch 
BBB 
BBB 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBEE 
BBBBBBB 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBB 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 
BBBBBBBBBBBA A AAGGGGGGG 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBAAAA A AAAAGGGGGGG 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBA AAA AAGQGGGG 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBAGG 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBAEEG 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBB A A AEEEGG 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEEEEEGGGGGGGGGGGGG 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB AAAAA AEEEEGQGG 
Table 5. — Graphic table of catches of king salmon in the Chignik district 
[See Table 2 for explanation. Each letter in this table represents a catch of 50 king salmon] 
1912. 
1913. 
1914. 
1915. 
1916. 
1917. 
1918. 
1919. 
1920. 
1921. 
1922. 
1923. 
1924. 
1925. 
1926. 
1927 
Year 
Catch 
B 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 
BBBBBBB 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBA AG 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBA AAAA 
BBBBBBBBBBBB 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 
BBBBBBBB 
BBBBBBBBBB 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 
BBB BBBBBBBE 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBEEEE 
BBBBBBBBBBBA EEEEEE 
BBBBBBBBBBBBBB BBB A A AEEG 
