208 
Fishery Bulletin 109(2) 
M 
MJO 
—. Q 
co ^ 
cn Q 
o 
25 
CD 
a. 
c n 
50 
25 
50 
25 
10 
18 
10 
10 
1990 
1990 
2020 
12 
2020 
Year 
Year 
Figure 8 
Time series of spawning outputs from simulation and stock synthesis assessment 
models (runs 9 to 16). The run number is shown in the upper right of each graph. 
See Table 2 for model and parameter setup for all runs Solid lines are median 
simulation outputs and thick dashed lines are median assessment outputs. Thin 
dashed lines are 2.5% and 97.5% of quantiles from simulation outputs. Specifica- 
tions for each panel are: M = constant M and MJO=high M in juvenile and old fish; 
L/L=logistic selectivity in both simulation and assessment models; D/D = double 
normal selectivity in both simulation and assessment models; D/L = double normal 
selectivity in simulation model, but logistic selectivity in assessment model; and 
L/D = logistic selectivity in simulation model, but double normal selectivity in 
assessment model. 
(Fig. 10). However, selectivity was poorly fitted for 
old fish (panel 12, Fig. 9). Percentages of runs that 
finished and that had satisfactory MGC rates were 
similar to those runs (runs 1 to 4) with the same 
selectivity and M specifications but with h priors 
included (Table 4). 
If no priors for h were used and natural mortality 
was estimated in the assessment models (runs 13 to 
