BY PHILIP LUTLEY SCLATER. 
viana—I believe 7. qyrola of Prince Maximilian, to be distinct 
from Desmarest’s Taunagra peruviana, and have named it Calliste 
castanonota, Orn. Cont. 1851, p. 63. 
P.16. Tatao coeruleocephalus, Bp.— This bird certainly belongs 
to the Chalcothraupis group; it is very nearly allied to Calliste 
thalassina, Strickland. 
P.17. Chrysothraupis frugilegus (Tsch.), I believe is merely the 
young of Tanagra striata (Gmel.) 
P.17. Lxothraupis chrysogaster is the same as Calliste wantho- 
gastra, Orn, Cont. 1851, parti. p. 23. This name has, I suppose, 
the priority over the Prince Canino’s, as he quotes the figure of 
C. chrysophrys in the Contributions, which was published along 
with it, under the head of the previous species. 
P. 18. Lzothraupis pusilla, Bp. = C. virescens mihi loco supra 
citato. Is Spix’s Tanagra graminea, pl. 53, fig. 2, intended for the 
female of this species ? 
P.18. Chalcothraupis must sink into a synonyme of Procnopis, 
since it contains P. argentea, which is the type species of the genus 
Procnopis. O. ruficervix, Bp., is Call. leucotis mihi nee Tanagra 
ruficervic, Fl. Prey. 
P. 19. Callospiza cannot be used in this sense, being coequal 
with Calliste. I propose in its place, for those who think the group 
worthy of a generic appellation, the term Huprepiste. 
P. 20. OC. cayanensis, Bp., is, I believe, merely the 2 of the suc- 
ceeding species. 
I append a list of the nine genera (so-called) into which Calliste 
has now been divided — 
1. Tatao, Bp., 1851 = Aglaia (Sw.) Reich. 
T. paradisea (Sw.) 
2. Calliste, Boié, 1826 = Callospiza, G. R. Gray. 
C. tricolor (Gm.) 
3. Chrysothraupis, Bp. 1851. 
C. aurulenta, Bp. 
4, Ixothraupis, Bp. 1851. 
T. punctata, Linn.  - 
. Procnopis, Cab. 1850. Chalcothranpis, Bp. 1851. 
P. atrocerulea, Cab. 
. Euschemon, Sclater (1851) = Calliste, Bp. 
E. flava (Gmel.) 
or 
for) 
95 
