312 Dr. Herschel’s observations of the satellites 
distance of the second satellite ; the first gave 40", 23 : the 
second, with the remark, pretty full measure, gave 41", 89 ; 
the third with the addition, not too large, gave 40", 20. 
J The satellite wa 32-4° np, and the distance 364. 
1787, April 9, io h 22'. I took two very accurate measures 
of the distance of the second satellite from the planet; the 
first gave 44 /, ,54, the second 44", 35. By temporary tables 
its expected place was 57 0 sf. 
I The satellite was 34 0 sf ; and its distance 563. 
1787, April 11, 9 h i8\ By temporary tables the expected 
situation of the second satellite was 4 0 sf. I took three good 
measures of its distance from the planet ; the first gave 34", 47 ; 
the second $5 "$ 2 ; the third 35", 74. A mean of them is 
34 >" 99 - 
J The satellite was 14 0 nf; and its distance 477. 
1787, April 17, 8 h 53'. The two satellites are on opposite 
sides of the planet. 
X The first was 405- 0 sf; distance 531. g h 6", the second 
was 2iy° np; distance 303. 
1787, September 19, 13 11 35'. The first satellite (miscalled 
second) is 83° sp ; the second (miscalled first) is about 
30° sf. 
J The first was 87^° sp; the second was 10^° sf. This 
being the first time of seeing the planet after its conjunction, 
accounts for the mistakes of the names. 
1787, October 11, i6 h 49'. The first satellite (miscalled 
second) is 78° np. Two good measures of its distance from 
the planet were taken; the first gave 33 ,, ,i 8, the second 
35 ", 96; a mean is 33", 37, i6 h 51'. The second satellite 
(miscalled first) is 40 0 sp. 
