51 6 Dr. Herschel's observations of the satellites 
the supposed third satellite was not a star remaining in its 
place. 
1750, February 11, 8° 50'. The satellites are in the places 
I had calculated. 8 h 56', the small star of the 9th of February 
I believe is wanting; at least I cannot see it though the wea- 
ther is very clear, but windy. An additional third and fourth 
are pointed out. 
X The first satellite was 74 0 np; the second was 7 0 nf. 
The third and fourth of this night were found to be stars. 
1790, February 12, n h 27'. The first and second satellites 
are in the places I had calculated. The third and fourth of 
last night are small fixed stars remaining in their places. The 
supposed third satellite of the ninth is not in the place where 
I saw it that night. 
X The first satellite was 27 0 np ; the second was 48^ 0 nf. 
1790, February 16, 8 h 2'. The first and second satellites 
are in the places I had calculated ; the situation of a supposed 
third is described. 
X The second was 56% 0 np ; the supposed third proved to 
be a star. 
1790, February 17. A configuration of stars situated in the 
planet’s path is delineated. 
1790, March 3, y h 58'. The first satellite is 4c 0 sp. 8 h 42', 
the second is 3 or 4 0 np. 
X The first satellite was 56° sp ; the second was o^-° np. 
1790, March 5, io h 38'. The first and second satellites are 
in the places I had calculated ; a 3d, with 600 is 36° sf ; a 
fourth is delineated. 
J The first satellite was 63° sf ; the second was 66° sp ; 
the third and fourth proved to be stars. 
