324 Dr. Herschel’s observations of the satellites 
February 26, 8 h 28'. The first satellite is 70° 53' sf. 8 h 7', 
the second is 66° 56' sp; many small stars are pointed out. 
X The first satellite was 78° sf ; the second was 67^ 0 sp ; 
the stars remained in their places. 
1794, February 28, 9 h 43'. The first satellite is 62° 55' 
nf. 9 h 26', the second is 86° 44' sp. 8 h 15', there is a very 
small star which I did not see the 26th ; it is brighter than a 
lettered star not far from it. Its position is pointed out by 
the stars of the configuration. 
X The first satellite was 6 \\ nf; the second was 87^-° sp. 
The stars remained in their places. The position of the small 
star of the 26th, by identification was about 24 0 nf. 
1794, March 2, 8° 25'. The first satellite seems to be at 
its greatest elongation ; the second satellite was not seen. 
X The first was 86° np ; distance 507 ; the second was 
55i° sf ; distance 275, therefore not visible. 
1794, March 4, n h 22'. I can see neither the first nor 
the second satellite. A third satellite is 61° 32' nf. Many 
small stars are pointed out. 
X The second satellite was 57-j 0 nf ; its distance 383; it 
was therefore visible, and its position agrees with the mea- 
sure taken of a satellite miscalled the third : the inaccuracy 
of my tables in 1794, occasioned the mistake. The small 
stars remained. 
1794, March 5, n h io'. The first satellite is 75 0 50' sp. 
io h 37', the second is 72 0 27' np. There is no star in the 
place where the supposed third was last night. Many small 
stars are again pointed out. 
X The first was 76° sp ; the second was 72^° nf. The 
absence of the miscalled third confirms the mistake, and 
