332 Dr. Hekschel’s observations of the satellites 
n h 49', I do not see the 5th satellite where it w r as February 
11 . 
I2 h o', the position of the two old satellites is 76° 48' nf. 
1 2 h if, I see the extremely small star x remaining in its 
former place. 
i2 h 44', the first and second satellites are exactly in a line 
pointing to the centre of the planet. A second measure of 
their position is 73 0 45'. I cannot see the 5th satellite in the 
place where it was February 11. 
J The first satellite was 78^ nf ; distance 594. The second 
was 78^- 0 nf ; distance 576. 
1798, February 15, n h 21'. There is a very small star 
in the line of the greatest northern elongation, it may possibly 
be an interior satellite, the first and second being invisible. 
I see the extremely small star x of the 11th perfectly well, 
but the 3th satellite of the same night is gone from the place 
where it was that evening. It was considerably brighter than 
x, so that if it w'ere in its place, I must certainly see it. 
n h 41', the star w'hich at n h 21' I supposed might be an 
interior satellite is too far from the planet; it may possibly 
be the 3th satellite of the 11th on its return from the northern 
elongation towards the planet. 
I believe there is another satellite or star between this last 
mentioned one and the planet ; I do not suppose the second 
satellite to be visible, otherwise it would agree well enough 
with the situation of the star between the 3th and the planet. 
By the configuration the intermediate star is at about half the 
distance of the farthest of the tw'o. 
i2 h if, position of the supposed 5th satellite 84° 49' nf. 
J The first satellite was 73 0 nf ; distance 124, it was there- 
