ctprinim:. 
317 
the second articulated, the others both articulated and divided 
distally ; anal fin with about 14 rays. 
Form. Lor. Upper Miocene : Oeningen, Baden. 
35524. Fine well-preserved specimen. Purchased, 1859. 
42786-87, 42796. Two good specimens, and one more distorted. 
Van Breda Coll. 
P- 9423. Imperfect fish. History unknown. 
1837. Two very small fishes and a tail, labelled by Agassiz. 
Egerton Coll. 
1C 3865. Another very small specimen. Enniskillen Coll. 
42(88, 42793-94. Three very small imperfect specimens. 
Van Breda Coll. 
Rhodeus latior, Agassiz. 
18-32. Rhodeus latior, L. Agassiz, Neues Jahrb. p. 134 (name only). 
1836-39. Rhodeus latior, L. Agassiz, Foiss. Foss. vol. v. pt. ii. p. 41, 
pl. llv. fig 7. . 
1861. Rhodeus magnus, T. C. Winkler, Descript. Poiss. Foss, d Oenm- 
gen (Natuurk. Verhandl. Holland. Maatsch. [2] vol. xiv.), p. 28, 
pl. iv. fig. 11. [Imperfect fish ; British Museum.] 
r ype. Imperfect fish ; olim Lavater Coll., Zurich. 
Closely similar to preceding species but stouter and somewhat 
larger. Length of head with opercular apparatus slightly less than 
maximum depth of trunk. 
Form. Sf Loc. Upper Miocene; Oeningen, Baden. 
42785. 
Type specimen of so-called B. magnus, described and figured 
by Winkler, loc. cit. Van Breda ColL 
1C 1838. Distorted specimen, labelled by Agassiz. Egerton Coll. 
42797. Imperfect fish, probably of this species. Van Breda Coll. 
A doubtfully-determined distorted fish from the Oligocene Lignite 
near Bonn is named Rhodeus exoplatus by F. G. Troschel, A erhandl. 
naturw. Vcr. preuss. Rheinl. vol. xi. (1854), p. 22, pl. ii. fig. 1. 
Another imperfect fish of quite uncertain affinities, from the 
C T pper Miocene of Licata, Sicily, is named Rhodeus edwardsi by 
H.E. Sauvage, Ann. Sci. Nat. [5] vol. xiv. (1870), art. no. 7,j. 16, 
a nd Ann. Sci. Geol. vol. iv. (1873), art. no. 1, p. 192, figs. (3, 87, 
The same species is recorded from Mondaino, Province of Forli, Italy, 
I. Bonomi, Rivista Ital. Paleont. vol. ii. (1896), p. 223. 
