IN PHYSICAL ASTRONOMY. 
03 03 
+ -A e e t y sin (2 t — x — 2 — y) — -Ji e e, y sin (2 t — x — 2 + y) 
[169] [170] 
3 3 
+ — ee,y sin (2 f + x + z — y) — — ee,ysin (2t + x + 2 + y) 
[171] [172] 
9 9 
+ — e e, y sin (x — 2 — y) — — e e, y sm (x — z + y) 
[173] ' [174] 
9 9 
— -g- ee,y s m (2 t — x + z — y) + — ee, y sin (2 t — x + 2 + y) 
[175] [176] 
21. 21 
— -Q- ee^ysin (2 i + x — 2 — y) + — ee,ysin (2 1 + x — z + y) 
[177] [178] 
~ ^ e i 2 7 sin (2z — y) + ~ e ( 2 y sin (2 z + y) - ^e/ 2 ysin (2t-2z-y) 
[179] [180] [181] 
+ in (2t — 2z + y) 
[182] 
The inequality of latitude of which the argument is 2 t — y being far greater 
than the rest, Is = y s U7 sin (2 t — y) nearly. 
If e = -0548442 e t = ‘9167927 y = '0900684 
See Mem. sur la Theorie de la Lune, p. 502. 
R - 7 2h?! / _ 9-3947865 - 9-8697237 cos 2 t + 9-6933013ecosx 
a 3 L 
[0] [1] [2] 
+ 0 3494 165 ecos (2 1 — x) — 9-8698883 ecos (2 1 + x) 
[3] [4] 
— 9-8718614^003 2 — 9-4138294 e t cos (2 1 — z) 
[5] [6] 
+ 9-5685221 e, cos(2< + r) + 9-0917777 e 2 cos 2x 
[7] [8] 
- 0-2709438 e 2 cos (2« — 2x) - 9 8697180 e 2 cos (2t + 2x) 
[9] [10] 
+ 9-8697237 ee, cos (x + 2 ) + 0-8935219 ee, cos (2 t — x — 2 ) 
[II] [12] 
