Appendix III.— BIBLIOGRAPHY. 
In the following bibliography the literature of the lobster, especially that relating 
to its habits and development, will be found to be fairly complete. All papers possess- 
ing scientific or historical interest to which reference is made, though some of them 
are of minor importance, have been included. 
Since, in my chapter on the embryology of this species, I have not entered into 
the comparative development of the Crustacea, it has been necessary to refer to but few 
general Avorks, and all physiological papers have been omitted when not in the direc- 
tion of my studies. 
1. Abbott, C. C. Are the “chimneys” of burrowing crayfish designed ? Amer. Nat., vol. xvm, pp. 
1157-1158. Phila., 1884. 
2. Aldrovandi, Ulyssis. A. U. philosophi et medici Bononiensis; de reliquis animalibus exsan- 
guibus libri quatuor, post mortem eius editi : Nempe de mollibus, crustaceis, testaceis, et 
zoophytis. De astaco. Cap. in, p. 108. 1st ed., fol. Bononiae, 1606. 
3. Andrews, E. A. Autotomyin the crab. American Naturalist, vol. 24, pp. 138-142, figs. 1-4 (pi. 
vi). Philadelphia, 1890. 
4. Aristotle. On the parts of animals. Transl. by W. Ogle. London, 1882. 
5. Atwood, N. E. On the habits and geographical distribution of the common lobster. Proc. Bost. 
Soc. Nat. Hist., vol. x, pp. 11-12. Boston, 1866. 
6. v. Baer, K. E. Ueher die sogenannte Erneuerung des Magens der Krebse u. die Bedeutnng der 
Krebssteine. Archiv f. Anat., Physiol., etc. Ed. by Johannes Muller. Pp. 510-523. Berlin, 
1834. 
7. Baker, H. A letter from Mr. Baker to the president, concerning the stones called crab’s eyes, etc. 
Phil. Trans. Boy. Soc. (abridged), vol. x, part in, pp. 876-879, for year 1750. London, 1756. 
8. Baster, J. Opuscula suhseciva. De astacis, tom. II, lib. 1, tab. 1. Harlemi, 1762. 
9. Bate, C. Spence. Notes on Crustacea. Ann. and Mag. of Nat. Hist., 2d ser., vol. vii, pp. 297-300, 
1 pi. 1849. 
10. Bate, C. Spence. Report of the committee appointed to explore the marine fauna and flora of 
the south coast of Devon and Cornwall. No. 2. Kept. Brit. Ass. Adv. Sci., 1867, pp. 275-287, 
pis. i-iii. London, 1868. 
11. Bate, C. Spence. Report on the present state of our knowledge of the Crustacea. Part in. 
Rept. Brit. Ass. Adv. Sci., 1877, pp. 36-55. London, 1878. 
12. Bate, C. Spence. Report on the present state of our knoivledge of the Crustacea. Rept. Brit. 
Ass. Adv. Sci., pp. 193-209, pis. v-vii. London, 1879. 
13. Bate, C. Spence. Report on the present state of our knowledge of the Crustacea. Part V. 
Rept. Brit. Ass. Adv. Sci., 1880, pp. 230-242. London, 1880. 
14. Bell, Thomas. A history of the British Stalk-eyed Crustacea. Pp. i-lxvi-|- 1-386. London, 1853. 
15. Belon. De aquatilibus. 1553. 
16. Bergh, R. S. Beitriige zur Emhryologie der Crustaceen. I. Zur Bildungsgeschichte des Keim- 
streifens von Mysis. Zool. Jahrb., Bd. vi, pp. 491-528, Taf. 26-29. Jena, 1893. 
17. Berniz, Martinus Bernhardus. Chela astaci marini monstrosa. Miscellanea curiosa medico- 
physica Academiw naturae curiosorum, annus secundus, Ohservatio C, p. 174 (fig.). 1671. 
18. Lo Bianco, Salvatore. Notizie hiologische riguardanti specialmente il periodo di maturity ses- 
suale degli animali del golfo di Napoli. Mitth. zool. Stat. zu Neapel, Bd. vin, pp. 385-440. 
1888. 
229 
