h •■ , phytol ments made to learn 
th< ■ owth < umber plar.- , 
is anei s on the effect of 
lind nt. All studies are being 
ntinued, urough the 1951 season is reported 
. 
R] I I.M KKAl I }. 
:nmendations for i . of the pickleworm prior to 1925 c( 
sist( • s. Q nee (16, 17), Smith ( 19, 20), 
( 21 ) advocated early planting, destruction of crop remnants, 
i use of > ip crop in cucumber and cantaloup planting 
Th« sidered ins* !es of little value. Quaintance and Smith did 
ie use of an arsenical spray to combat the melonworm. 
or rotenonc lining materials were among the most effec f 
discussions of • '-worm published between 1937 and 
194 , Arant l , . _i, and Fulton (_U). Fulton 
small ■ ■ , ite residue^ 
>lina wh- fruits we • ked S' 
He also obtained promising results wit! ;n 
He < red the use of squash as a trap crop to be of 
! the destruction of d- op remnants of no bene! 
eems first to express t ; hat the pickle- 
inters only in semitropi ^ions, where a continuous 
soi f food ble. Our findings ' ears substantiate 
. 
In inia by Bro \nders 
nd Hoi rH hlori^: 
Dl) l , md TDE (DDD) ] ■ • linst ■ n, but 
thai ui rtditiona BHC caused 
nijui ■;. nd cantaloup . ell 
hlorii 
inflicting inju . Alban and Keirns {I), 
I : ; (7), and M . , tests in Ohio, 
I Canada, 
l . 
. 
Duprei 
lane, parath Lon, pur DT, nd ci 
In the in this pub: [cation, nd 
