32 
Table 14. — Comparison of daUy dietaries of fruitarians and vegetarians with commonly 
< 1 1 -t-epted stan da rds — Continued . 
Weight 
subject. 
Nature 
of 
dietary. 
Cost. 
Pro- 
tein. 
Fat. 
Car- 
bohy- 
drates. 
Fuel 
value. 
Nutri- 
tive 
ratio. 
STUDIES WITH MEN— cont'd. 
Man, 22 years old, dietary 
No. 36i.a 
Man, 22 years old, dietary 
No. 362. 
Man, 25 years old, dietary 
No. 363. 
Average 
Pounds. 
168.0 
170.0 
151. 
Mixed 
Fruitarian 
do 
Cents. 
30.7 
33.4 
47.0 
Grams. 
87 
85 
68 
62 
63 
54 
74 
103 
100 
112 
118 
125 
90 
Grams. 
100 
159 
103 
98 
66 
22 
2S 
138 
Grams. 
433 
366 
615 
401 
Calories. 
2,870 
2,937 
3,305 
9 .1Q3 
1. 
7.6 
8.5 
12.3 
10.0 
11.8 
11.6 
10.3 
7.3 
6 1 
Man, 48 vears old ( Albu) . . . 
153.0 
125. 
138.0 
Vegetarian ... 
593 s' so? 
Man, 28 rears old (Voit)... 
do 
573 
700 
436 
2, 775 
3,431 
3,500 
2,700 
3,0.50 
3,055 
3,400 
2,450 
Man, 19 vears old (Runipf 
do 
and Schumm). 
Average of 53 studies of 
well-to-do families in 
the United States. 
DIETARY STANDARDS. 
Man at sedentarv or wo- 
Mixed 
man with moderately 
active work (Atwater). 
Man with light to moder- 
do 
6 1 
ate muscular work (At- 
water). 
Man with moderate mus- 
do 
56 

500 
5 3 
cular work (Voit). 
Man with moderately ac- 
tive muscular work (At- 
water). 
Woman with light to 
moderate muscular 
work, or man without 
muscular exercise (At- 
water). 
do 
6 2 
do 
6 1 
" Not included in average. 
It will be seen from the table that the results of the two investiga- 
tions at the University of California (1901 and 1902) correspond very 
closely and also agree in the main with the findings of the German 
investigators quoted in showing a uniformly small amount of protein 
in the daily diet. This appears to obtain whether the diet is exclu- 
sively or partly fruitarian. 
It will be noted that the nutritive ratios of dietaries Nos. 359 and 357 
are narrower than in previous dietary studies with the same subjects. 
This and the increased fuel value and the decreased cost of the dieta- 
ries also observed are presumably partly due to the use of cereals in 
the latter studies. A comparison of dietaries Nos. 332, 333, and 358 
shows that at less cost the latter furnishes more protein and energy 
than No. 332. Dietary No. 333 furnishes more protein with nearly 
the same fuel value as stated for No. 358, but the daily cost of the 
former (27.5 cents) greatly exceeds that of the latter (15.7 cents). 
The tabulated results of the fruitarian and vegetarian dietaries for 
men show that the minimum quantity of protein (40 grams) and energy 
(1,712 calories) per day are found in dietary No. 355. It is of more 
than passing interest to observe that the maximum daily protein con- 
tent for the fruitarian dietaries (85 grams) is not reported with a 
