63 
Of the peculiarities of the decree's, and in the table below are 8UD1- 
marized the findings and decrees. The wide divergence between the 
quantities of water granted and the capacities of the canals and need. 
of the land has been responsible for nearly all the litigation. The 
first table is a summary of the report of the referee appointed to take 
testimony and report findings upon which the court should render its 
decree. The second table is the decree of the eourt supposedly based 
on the report of the referee. 
Claims jrresented to f</<r>< and his findings <>u which <h<-rt> bythejudg< was rendered. 
Name of ditch 
Width. 
Bottom. Top 
BigThompson.No.la 
Big Thompson and 
M a n u fact urin g 
Cn.'s Ditch 
Do 
Do 
Do 
Mariano c 
Fanners' Irrigating^ 
Do.d 
Do./ 
Big Thompson Irri- 
gating/ 
Lovcland and Gree- 
ley? 
Lovcland and Gree- 
ley branch* 
bo 
Do.' 
Lovcland and Gree- 
ley/ 
Lovcland and Gree- 
ley branch* 
Do./ 
Lovcland and Gree- 
ley 
Big '1 hompson ami 
Platte River 
Do.'" 
Rist and Ooss 
Do." 
Hill and Brush 
London 
Do 
George Risto 
Do 
Hillsboro 
Do./' 
Do 
Handy 
I )o 
South Side"/ 
Home Supply I 
Feet. 
10 
6 
s 
S 
I 
• 15.1 
■ IV 1 
'■15.1 
4. 
9 
3 
< t; 
10 
I 
12 
11 
11 
• 16 
< it;. 
• 18 
Feet. 
M 
li 
5 
Length 
15 
18 
is 
18 
Miles. 
s 
2. 2S 
1.5 
15 
1.5 
15 
15 
15 
3 
2. 75 
3.5 
3.5 
26. 5 
i 
1 
1 
4.7 
:-;. 7 
19.5 
2. 3 
12.3 
19.3 
21.5 
21 . 5 
9 
26 
Depth. 
Feet. 
3 
1 
2. 5 
2 
3 
0. 2 
3. 2 
3.2 
3.2 
1 
2 
2 
2.5 
2.5 
2 
2. 5 
: 
2. 5 
2. 5 
1.5 
3 
3.5 
3.5 
1.3 
2.7 
3 
2. 6 
4 
2 
4 
Kail per 
milt 
No. of 
Amount Am. unit 
Feet. 
7 
25 
25 
25 
25 
8.92 
10 
'.v.'/ 5 ' decreed.lclaimed, 
ity. 
6.7 
6.7 
5 
5 
2. 1 
5 
4. 2 
1.2 
2. 5 
4 
1 
3.2 
Cu./t. 
P< /• 8< C. 
1 96. 50 
34.20 
37.10 
65. 17 
9 
38. 11 
:». 72 
2. (JO 
54.08 
7s 
18.56 
1.5 7 8.36 18.36 
2 13 a 12. GO 
2 17 39.40 39.40 
Ou.ft. 
perseC. 
96.50 
37. U) 
II. '.Ml 
90.86 
3.12 
:.. 72 
•_'. 86 
62.40 
l.s.56 
21| 
18 
31 
9 
29 
11 
18 
• 
21 
21 
25 
in 
:.l 
39 
17 
19.92 19.93 
:::>. 50 
15. 20 
35.50 
15. 20 
Under 
ditch. 
Acres. 
2,640 
920 
1,320 
2. isti 
2,180 
Irriga- 
ted. 
Acres. 
2,500 
400 
1,000 
1,600 
1,500 
120 
2, 100 
2,100 
2,100 
1,000 
4,300 
4,300 
4,300 
1,000 
3,600 
3,250 250 
690 690 
690 690 
3,600 
1,400 
2, 100 
35 
st',. is 
6. 11 
st i. (17 
61.80 
40 
154.30 
195 
195 
'.•-.». l". 
15. 69 
31.20 
141.23 
27-. s | 
35 
86.18 
10.50 
80.07 
10 
158.80 
195 
195 
inn 
■526" 
" I'V" 
3,000 
3,000 
too 
inn 
1,600 
1:;. in.; 
1.;. in;; 
3,500 
3,500 
300 
6.000 
6,000 
in. 000 
]IMMH. 
1,500 
15,000 
560 
1, ino 
1,800 
297. 11 528 30.000 1.000 
1,500 
2,000 
1 . 
225 
1,500 
100 
2, lint 
300 
1,800 
3,000 
1,000 
7,000 
600 
1 1 . 521 ' 
n 0.026 cubic fool L inch. 
bFoll capacity. 
'■Not sufficient data to render a decree. 
d All in one application. 
e Average width. 
/Capacity 103 cubic feet. 
g Barnes Ditch. 
>'7.s feet recommended by referee. 
'12.6 recommended by referee— branch Lovcland 
and Greeley. 
/Barnes Ditch. 
A17.3 recommended by referee. 
/9. 1 cubic feel recommended by referee, 
m Capacity 78 cubic feet. 
" Amount carried 1. 7 cubic feet. 
"Am. .nut carried 121 cubic feet. 
/'Amount carried 71 feet. 
•i Amount carried 15. 6 feet. 
