on, St. Lou: . ri, January 31, 1 9 ' : 1 , -s carried in 
of the National Defense Advisory Commission, 
~ "" ~ ■ ., .1, Vol. 2, I!o. 5. 
3. Farm Pr grams i An address by R. I/. Evans, Ad- 
is tr".tor"~of~~tn~7TgrTr r^cTjustment Administration, at the 
ireau Federation Annual* Meeting, Baltimore, Maryland, 
jember , I 1*0. 
U. p robl'-r.s Ahead for American Farmers: An address by 
R. I . :,s, Administrator of ■. A ricultural Adjustment Adminis- 
nnnual meeting of 's Grain Dealers Association of 
Iowa, Pes Moines, Iowa, January 29, 19l|l. 
5. The Impact of 7 r ar and the Defense Program on Amerioo* 
Culture ; j; ?Tr^Ts by ~ r 7 T. ~Chr is ty~ ~As s i s t ant "LTrector, Office 
of ■ Agricultural Relations, at Purdue University Agricultural 
Confer' ncc, Lafayette, Indiana, January 15, 191:1. 
6. Prota ad Possibilities Under Market! moment Pro- 
rr r T. .s : in address by Lr. E. A'. Gaumnit z , Ass i r> t ant A dm ir. . Er ':or~, 
-rketing Administration, at State College Farm and Home Week, 
Ithi . v York, February 12, 19I4I. 
7. Weak: ana Strong Features of our Farm Policies : An address 
by Claude R. V'ickard, Secretary of Agric-atturj , at A -- . -- :.al Farm In- 
• meting, Des -, I ova, February 22, 19i-P- . 
In addition to this mi t rial, I fc1 ation is called to a paper 
■-'. l.'r. H. R. Tolley, Chief of the Bureau of Agricultural Economics, 
■ d for of tho American Economic Associati'. • :.ew 
Orleans, Dec anbor 26, l r 'l40, entitled "Agriculture in the American 
nomy: An Appraisal of the National Interest in the Agricultural 
Situation." Tais is an excellent background statement of our agri- 
turi 1 ] roblcm and some of t . ;tors that must be considered in 
ping continuing agricultural pr ;r 
