The data given above w us tabulated according to number of fishes* 
The following enumeration has no significance as an indicator of the 
relative bulk of food foned by each species as a minnow two lnohee 
long has a standing equal to that of a iienhadon fifteen inches in length* 
It gives however* an idea of the loss of individual fish through pelicans 
and is thus of value* 
Opposite the none of each species of fish is given the number of 
individuals that vs re noted in the £46 meals tabulated and the percent- 
age that this makes of the whole* 
The speoies are arranged in systematic order after Jordan and Bver- 
mann (Bull. 47, U* 3* Rational Uuseum). 
Table II 

Pomoloba . modlocrls 
Brevoortla tyrannus 
j to le chorus brovnl 
Gyprinodon carpio 
Hycorhamchua robertl 
Hboidla sp. 
augll eenhalus 
\ 7 * r •> ,’ > 
Ohlorosoombrue ohry suras 
Ltciaenops ocel lotus 
SSS^SJL 
9 
♦ 
744 
10 
£5 
2 
1 
7 
14 
2 
0H 
... 
1.1 
91.4 
1*2 
3.2 
*2 
.1 
» r-‘ 
On examining this tabulation it is seen that there are only two 
species included that are considered to be valuable food fish. These are 
the mullet t flugll ce chains ) nnd the red fish or channel-bass ( aolaenoi/s 
ocallatus ) • 
jevon of the first and two of the second were included* 
