204 
Apatura 
Pars 86 
Schinett., 1, p. 92, t. 22, f. 1 a, b (1829)* 
— Boisduval, Eur. Lep. Index (Monogr. 
Zygaen. App.), p. 14 (1829). — Nymphalü i., 
G ue rin- Mene ville, Icon. Rögne Anim. Cuvier, 
7, Ins., t. 78, f. 5, 5 a (chrysal.) ; p. 477 
(1829 — 44). — Papilio (Apatura) i., Klopsch, 
Beitr. Ent. Schles. Fauna, 1, p. 207 (1829) 
(biol.). — P. i., Schott, Schmettkal., p. 52; 
id., Raupenkal., p. 12 (1830). — Nym - 
phalis i ., M6netri6s, Oat. rais. Zool. Gaucase, 
p. 251 (1832). — Herr, Anlei tg. Schinett. 
Raup., ps. 2, p. 76 (1833). — Apatura 
(Ochsenheimer) & Treitschke, Schmett. Eur., 
10, p. 26, 221 (1834). — Boisduval, Spec. 
Gön. L6p., 1, p. 131 (1836). — Papilio i 
Vogel, Chron. Raupencal., p. 17, t. 7, f. 17 
(1835). — Buhle, Raup. Schmettkal., p. 18, 
24, 61 (1837); Apatura id., Tag.-Abond- 
schmett. Eur., p. 23 (1837). — Nickerl, 
Böhm. Tagfalt., p. 11 (1837). — Selys- 
Longchamps, Cat. Löp. Belg., p. 17 (1837). — 
Thon (& Reiche nberg), Naturg. Schm., p. 75, t. 
34, f. 521— 526, 527 (larva), 528, 529 (text, 
„clytia, Iris lutea“), t. 25, f. 530,531 (1837 & 
1838). — Voigt, Lehrb. Zool., 5, p. 37 
(1840) (sine cit.). — Boisduval, Gen. Ind. 
möth. Eur. L6p„ p. 24 (1840). — Nymphalis 
i., Blanchard, Hist. An. Artic., 3, p. 452* 
t. 45, f. 1 (1840). — Apatura t\, Herrich- 
Schäffer in Fürohr, Naturh. Topogr. Re- 
gensburg, 3, p. 152 (1840). — Hering, 
Ent. Zeitg. Stettin, 1, p. 152 (1840) (Pom- 
mern). — Gräfe, Naturg., 1, p. 514 (1841). 
— Neustädter & Kornatzki, Abb. Beschr. 
Schmett. Schles., p. 28, t. 11, f. 35 a, b 
(1842). — Herrich-Sehaeffer, Syst. Beschr. 
Schmett. Eur., 1, p. 45; 6. Nachtr. vol. 1), 
p. 6 (1843 & 1856). — Doubleday, List Lep. 
Brit. Mus., 1, p. 108 (1844). — Eversmann, 
Fauna Lep. Volgo-Ural, p. 20 (1844). — 
Duponchel, Oat. m£th. L6p. Eur., p. 11 
(1844). — Tachyptera E. Herold, Teutsch. 
Raupenkal., p. 71 (1846). — Apatura i., 
Dickor6, 2. Ber. Oberhess. Ges. Natur-Heilk., 
p. 3 (1849). — Vigelius, Jahrb. Ver. Natk. 
Nassau, Heft 6, p. 46 (1850). — (Doubleday 
& Hewitson) & Westwood, Gen. Diurn. Lep., 
2, p. 304 (1850) (cit. part.). — A. Speyer, 
Ent. Zeitg. Stettin, 11, p. 252 (1850) (distrib. 
geogr.). — Heydenreich, Lep. Eur. Oat. 
Meth., p. 8 (cit. part.) (1851). (vide Hünich, 
Bestimmg. Esper, Eur. Schmett., 1854, p. 3). 
— Doering, Schles. Tagfalt., Progr. Gymn. 
Brieg, p. 6 (1851). — Chenu & H. Lucas, 
Enc. Hist. Nat., Papill., p. 149, f. 265; p. 
150 (1851). — Fischer v. Waldheim & 
Eversmann, Entomogr. Imp. Ross., 5, p. 
146, 149 (part.) (non t. 18, f. 3, 4 = forma 
prope here Feld.) (1851) (Russ. centr., me- 
rid.). — Keferstein, Ent. Zeitg. • Stettin, 12, 
