114 
FETCH : 
529. Favolus Friesii B. & C. (November, 1867). 
One Ceylon specimen, in Herb. Kew, is labelled 
‘‘ Favolus lacerus Fr., Ceylon, 1854,” another single 
specimen is marked Thwaites 91. Both are small 
examples of the species assigned to F , brasiliensis . 
530. Favolus multiplex Lév. (35, cum icone). 
In Herb. Kew, sub F. multiplex, are Thwaites 35 ; 
and also specimens collected by Thwaites in 1851, 
marked ‘‘ Favolus multiplex Uy .—Favolus Thwaitesii 
Berk.” The latter was published as Favolus multiplex 
var. Thwaitesii, in Kew Garden Miscellany, 1854, p. 229. 
In Herb. Peradeniya, Favolus multiplex and F . brasi- 
liensis are on the same sheet. 
The specimens of this are merely the older form of 
those assigned to F . brasiliensis ; the figure, however, 
labelled F . multiplex, represents the thinner younger 
stage, the specimens of which were placed under the 
former name. If the division of Thwaites 35 into two 
species were correct, the figure should have been named 
F . brasiliensis. 
Berkeley and Broome’s 528, 529, 530 are all the same 
species, probably Favolus multiplex Lév., but apparently 
not the Favolus multiplex figured by Theissen in Poly- 
poraceæ Austro-brasilienses, 1911. 
531. Favolus tessellatus Mont. (46, cum icone). 
Herb. Kew contains eleven specimens of Thwaites 46, 
sub F . tessellatus. There are six specimens in Herb. 
Peradeniya. The figure represents F . ruficeps, but is 
labelled F. tessellatus. The Ceylon specimens are 
almost sessile, and probably not Favolus tessellatus 
Mont. They agree exactly with Lloyd’s figure of 
Hexagonia Miquelii (Mont.) in Synopsis Hexagona, 
p. 36. 
532. Favolus scaber B. & Br. (618, 46 in part). 
In Herb. Kew are five specimens of Thwaites 618 and 
one specimen Thwaites 46. This species bears much 
resemblance to F . tessellatus, but is not glabrous above. 
It is distinct, and should be Hexagonia, not Favolus. 
