PLATE CV. 
We have only to add our regret, that the Cepola Tsnia of Bloch 
never fallen under our own observation, and that our inferences 
for this reason necessarily drawn from figures and descriptions, 
'''^lich, however correct, are not sufficiently satisfactory to inspire 
*^onfidence, and authorise us in determining whether the two fishes 
specifically distinct or not. 
In the specimen of Cepola rubescens now before us, the dorsal fin 
*^nntains seventy rays: pectoral twelve; ventral six: anal sixty -nine; 
*nd tail nine. 
