677 
cable safeguard, at least until the general supply consists of good, 
clean, fresh, safe milk. 
One of the chief objections to pasteurization is that it promotes 
carelessness and discourages the efforts to produce clean milk. It is 
believed that the general adoption of pasteurization will set back 
improvements at the source of supply and encourage dirty habits. 
It will cause the farmers and those who handle the milk to believe 
that it is unnecessary to be quite so particular, as the dirt that gets 
into the milk is going to be cooked and made harmless. It is not 
proposed that pasteurization shall take the place of inspection and 
improvements in dairy methods. To insure the public a pure and 
safe milk supply should be regarded as one of the most important 
duties of the health officer. Whether pasteurization is adopted by a 
city for its general milk supply or not, no milk should be accepted 
that does not comply with certain reasonable chemical and bacterio- 
logical standards. This would aid the inspectors in enforcing good 
dairy methods. Pasteurization then must not be used as an excuse to 
bolster up milk unfit for home consumption. To insure this end, the 
health officer should have authority to condemn and destroy bad milk, 
whether or not pasteurization is practiced. 
To obtain a good milk supply involves not only an expensive 
system of inspection and surveillance from the farm to the consumer, 
but intelligence and a high degree of technical skill on the part of 
the producer and all others who handle the milk. 
We can scarcely conceive of an inspection so thorough and constant 
as to prevent milk occasionally becoming contaminated with the 
i germs of typhoid, diphtheria, scarlet fever, dysentery, tuberculosis, 
etc. 
If our drinking water is defiled at its source we boil or filter it. 
It would be much better to prevent its contamination. The same is 
Urue of milk. We prefer pure milk, but* so long as we can not obtain 
it we must purify what we get. The situation may well be illustrated 
by the attitude of an eminent sanitarian in New York, who in his 
; writings and public addresses discourages pasteurization, because 
theoretically it does not reach the source of the evil, and is not as 
' good in the end as purification of the milk supply through efficient 
I inspection. However, when this same sanitarian is consulted by a 
large wholesale dealer of New York, who handles many thousands of 
quarts of more or less old dirty milk a day, he is confronted by a con- 
dition, not a theory, and advises pasteurization. 
: . There is a prevalent impression that the pasteurization of milk 
i improves that important article of diet. Heating does not render 
i milk better in any way as a food. All it does is to destroy certain 
I bacteria and some of their toxic products. It checks certain proc- 
!| esses of fermentation and putrefaction, thus rendering the milk safer. 
