CHILL 
57 
Page 28. — 2. Proustia pyrifolia; foUis petiolatis cordato-rotundatis ovalibusve subtiis tomentosis, 
acheniis pilosis. Don. — Lag. et De Cand. in Ann. du Mas. v. 19. p. 70. t. 4. Don in Linn. Trans, v. 16. 
p. 198. — Hab. Valparaiso. 
Page 29. — 2. Eupatorium ageratoides? Linn. — Spreng. Syst. Veget. v. 3. p. 419. — Hab. Valparaiso. — 
The present plant may perhaps be a distinct species, having the stems shrubby at the base, the leaves smaller 
and more irregularly toothed. 
Page 30. — 9.* Spilanthes. — 1. S. oleracea. Linn. — Spreng. Syst. Veget. v. 3. p. 444. — Hab. Valpa- 
raiso. — We may here remark that the Eupatorium Chilense is the Flaveria Contrayerva of Persoon, (Feuill. 
V. 3. t. 14.) 
Page 30. — 11.* Euxenia. — 1. E. grata. Cham, in Hor. PJiys. Ber. p. 75. t ,16. — Ogiera triphnervia. 
Spreng. Syst. Veget. v. 3. p. 674. (not of Cassini.) — Hab. Conception. — The plant of Cassini appears iden- 
tical with Eleuther anther a ovalifolia, Poit., from St. Domingo, and is herbaceous. 
Page 30. — 2. Baccharis linearis ; foUis linearibus dentatis integen-imisque, floribus subcorymbosis. Spr. 
— Pers. Syn. PI. v. 2. p. 425. Spreng. Syst. Veget. v. 3. p. 463. — Hab. Valparaiso. — This has the leaves 
much larger and longer than in B. rostnarinifolia, and they are, in general, decidedly toothed. 
Page 31. — 6. Baccharis rigida ; canle fruticoso ramoso, foliis coriaceis rigidis ovali-eUipticis sessilibus 
venosis spinoso-dentatis, paniculis corymbosis. — Hab. Valparaiso. — This we have received also from Mr. 
Cruckshanks and IMr. Bridg-es. 
Page 31. — 7. Baccharis absinthioides ; caule erecto herbaceo ramoso angulato foliisque lanceolatis acutis 
in petiolum attenuatis integerrimis vel grosse remote dentato-serratis incanis, corymbis multilloris, 
floribus congestis, pedunculis incano-tomentosis. — «. foliis longioribus subintegerrimis. — 13. foliis omnibus 
dentato-serratis. — Hab. «. Conception. /3. Valparaiso. (Mi-. Bridges.) — Leaves often fascicled, 3-4 inches 
long ; under the microscope exhibiting minute yellow dots. Mi-. Bridges states it to be from 6-8 feet high. 
Page 31. — 14.* Conyza. Linn . — 1. C. ambigua. De Cand. FI. Fr. ed. 4. v. 5. p. 468. — C. Chilensis. 
Spreng. Syst. Veget. v. 3. p. 513. — Erigeron linifolium. Willd. 
Page 32. — 5. Senecio Bridgesii ; suffruticosus, glaber, foliis sessilibus piniiatifidis laciniis linearibus 
acutis, corymbo denso multifloro, involucris subcyUndraceis, foliolis uniseriahbus apice vix sphacelatis basi 
bracteolatis, radio patente. — Hab. Valparaiso ; whence we have also had it from Mr. Bridges. — It is nearly 
allied to S. artemisiifolius, but that is herbaceous, and has bipinnatifid leaves. 
Page 32. — 17.* Madia. Mol. — 1. M. viscosa. Cav. Ic. v. 3. p. 50. t. 298. Curt, in Bot. Mag. t. 2574. — 
M. mellosa. Mol. — Jacq. — M. sativa. Mol. — Spr. — Madi, Feuill. Chil. v. 3. t. 26. — Hab. Valparaiso. 
Page 32. — Helianthus glutinosus . — We have since ascertained that the plant so called at p. 32, is the H. 
thurifer of Mohna, whose name ought therefore to be prefen-ed. 
Page 32. — 18.* Xanthium. Linn. — 1. X. spinosum. Linn . — Hab. Valparaiso. — May not the X. catharticum 
of Kunth, from Peru, be the same ? 
Page 33. — Obd. XXXIV.* CAMPANULACE.a2. Juss. — 1. Wahlenbergia. Schrad. — 1. W. Unari- 
oides ; caule erecto basi simphci glabfo vel scabriusculo, foliis Hneari-acuminatis angiistis glabris subdenti- 
culatis, calycis tubo glabro obconico, corolla infundibuliformi profunde 5-fida laciniis calycinis dimidio longiore, 
capsula obconica. Alph. De Cand. Campan. p. 158. — Campanula Chilensis. Mol. — C. linarioides. Lam . — 
Hab. Valparaiso. 
Page 36. — 4. Solanum tuberosum. Linn. — Hab. Valparaiso. 
Page 37. — 6. Nicotiana. Linn. — 1. N. acuminata; herbacea, pubescens, fohis lato-laiiceolatis acuminatis 
undulatis sublonge petiolatis, paniculis paucifloris, calyce glanduloso-pubescente laciniis angustis, coroUse tubo 
elongato, limbi laciniis rotundatis obtusis. — Bot. Mag. t. 2919. — Petunia acuminata. Graham in Edin. Phil. 
Journ. July, 1828. p. 378. — Nicotiana augustifolia ? Iluiz et Pav. FI. Per. v. 2. t. 130. — Hab. Valparaiso. — 
Upon comparing- oui- plant with the N. angustifolia, Ruiz and Pav., we can scarcely discover any difference . 
H 
