little gurnaud. 
37 
about four incbes, the present specimen agrees in many respects, 
ut c le y differs in the profile being less vertical, in the 
anterior lobes of the snout, and in the negative character of 
wanting a deep transverse hollow behind the posterior orbital 
spme; nor with the highest power of a lens can any of the 
nterioi dorsal spines be distinguished as toothed, nor the first 
and second rays of the dorsal fin as serrated, both of which 
characters are attributed to T. aspera. 
Since the above was written I have had an opportunitv of 
comparing the Tnyla here treated of with two specime.^ of 
one three inches and a half, the other four and a 
Mrongly to cooErm eycrytbing staid’ .“"'‘I 
had ptcvioasly been obtained ooW aT Dieon^ 
wmia^ 
trawira^that t ' - the 
Exa^nl 7 ’ " sometimes in considerable numbers. 
also'cZe unTe'^^ answering to the foregoing account have 
ChanncT fro tVT the Bristol 
dedZZThe Z ‘'--■Option is 
z r exceeded an inch in length- 
the xic&d larffC! eves elpvato/1 • -p i-v i t i o 
in the middlo " ^^evated, top of the head rather flattened; 
m the middle of the ascent from the snout to the eve are 
£r;.; r^d: 
.hem,“,o: wir.be°4ttr«tT tat rT t 
. line .itb tbe eye. just LvVta peettta^f “ 
another on the posterior gill-cover A M r’ ^ ^ 
angle of the jaw, a little before the venuZ 
prominent line of sharp points borders the dl- 
dorsal high, close behind the hot./l . “ "loisal fins. First 
separate from the first. The colour ’ of 
in- spirits, was a dull greem 
