49 
RUDD. 
redeye. FINSCALE. 
(^.Wrinns P- 252. tab. Q. 3. 
s™K,pnr“- 
“ (I Feejting; Br. Animals, p. 188. 
“ „ Jenyns; Mannal, p. 412. 
Yaiuiell; Br. F., vol. i, p. 412. 
of WilfoughW^^lt "^hen Ray was engaged in editing the work 
a fish which was cILd^ regards 
“light not bp (-b ^ Germany— as to wliether it 
^odeye; and wl “ England was called Rudd or 
doubt had becomr^s^tfT^’*^* synopsis this 
doubt or mistake f certainty. But this 
Er. Flemino.. ‘ , ° illustrious Ray was carried further by 
and Ray as° tb n represents the Rudd of Willoughby 
difiTerent from Germany, but also that this Rudd is 
a distinct ^ 0“h«f the Redeye. The Orfus is 
Britain. species, but it has not been recognised in 
‘districts ^ frequents the same natural 
supposed to have b f’oth found; and it is 
“otice, and not i® worthy oi 
common in “ot easily accounted for, that the former fish is 
not known in S Ireland, while the true Roach is 
the Ruclq a country, although supposed to be so because 
resemblance to pn**.b^^*^A “ame. Ihey do indeed bear some 
them may be ^ distinction of form between 
“>in«d tL„ rt',™'' I'"® ‘“'"'Vi “d, if closely ei- 
appetites of enob ^ ^ i characteristic habits and 
■ftc food of , 1 , p , ° '■'O'" “'C »™- 
several kinds worms, molluscous creatures of 
Vol. IV, ’ vegetables; but as it requires a good depth 
H 
