141 
1872.] Hoernle — Essays on the Qaurian Languages. 
According to the Prakrit Prakasa VIII, 62, the participal past passive of the 
root to give is in Prakrit (for Sanskrit ^vf) and from by a regu- 
lar process of phonetic modification, which I shall explain later on, the form 
originated. By analogy it follows that the other two forms «fri«rr 
and ^ftvrT must also be derived from original Prakrit forms fqfnj and (of 
the roots a and « ). It is true that neither far«J nor f^nir are supported by 
any of Vararuehi’s Sutras, nor by the Prakrit of the plays founded upon those 
Sutras. But as the process of phonetic change was certainly not stop- 
ped by Vararuchi’s Sutras, the phase of Prakrit exhibited in his Sutras can- 
not be taken as a measure of what Prakrit may have been at a much later 
period. There is not the least difficulty, therefore, in assuming that the 
Prakrit of later times and perhaps among the vulgar, contained many forms 
which have not found admittance in Vararuchi’s Sutras or in dramatic Pra- 
krit. Among those later or more vulgar forms fqrcT and must have 
heen.f Their existence is necessary to account for the existence of the 
Das. The others. without V are the more original onos and occur for example in Kabir 
Chand ; e. g., 
>5fT ^irsi*5 | 
5T5T 5S15T S*JJT ifipfl II *. e. 
High Hindi : mi V(T^S( TVVT | 
HI TJI-irT -if f^UT II 
Tulsi Das Ramayan, Ajudhya Kami. 
Again : 57Tfv qTtT % *JtpTT ^TT I 
IlST fV ~Pf=TT II i. e. 
High Hindi : 3T^T 3iT% IJtPTT f^T I 
^^rfT ^ ^T% %T f^TUT II 
Kabir, Rekhtas. 
Again : JT5T 3ipr I 
Wt ^ II i. e. 
High Hindi : 3TT -til fa»=qT I 
^rai ^ q^r ii 
Pr. R&j Ray., I, 1 1 . 
Again : '-FIV ill ?jfif a^f 1 
VIPS J2W qiVT 11 i. e. 
High Hindi : 35JT HiKST fqf *JT1 «q faVT I 
fllff %I V*I BsTST II 
Pr. Eaj II tv., 1, 18. 
* The dontal «T for original qt according to general Hindi usage. 
t In P. P. vm, 13, it is stated the root IF or IF r may change 
he does for (= Sanskrit q>Tlf<T). Prom tffqr a p as t, part, 
®ay be derived and it is not improbable, that giW might ohange into by the 
analogy 0 f just as e. y.q^q man changes into qf^V ; of. P, P, I, 33. 
into sp 1 ?; e. g. 
passive ~qi ,T f 
