
          monostachyis - p.102, l.5 for brevissimaque, read [loevissimaque?]. p. 103, l. [line] 3.
for aut trigono, read aut angulato-compresso. same p. n° 4, after
(N. ab. E. [Nees von Esenbeck]) insert culmo ancipiti. p. 104, at section 6, for culmo acutri  
aut quadrangulari, read culmo [austr?] 4-5 angularis. p. 109, n°11,
l.3, for monandris, read 1-2- andris. - sam p. n° 19.l.13, for S. [?]
read S. fumilus - p.110, delete my observn (observation) under Hymenochaete [?]
[Roxburghia millibi ?] for I now have found out where he does very
so - p. 118, n°11, l. 8, for Canvollata read canceolata. - p. 123.
n° 21 ; I doubt much if this be really C. cruciata Wahl : I think not and 
if new, it may be called C. Hooderiana. - p. 126, n°31, l.6, for an
greatissime, read argutissime - Ohe jam satis!  There
are some others more trifling which you can correct yourself 
I mention the above because they could not have been deleted
without Nees wish or specimens.
Nees has lately published a synopsis  of all the genus of Cyperacea
in the Linnea (vol. 9. p. 273) with an enumeration of all the species
he has : he sent me a [depigrata ?] copy, but as I take in the work
itself, and am not sure that you do, I send you the copy I got from
Nees - if you really take in the work itself - and do not require what
I send, you can return it to me - I many remark on it, that no
44 Morisia (the same as at p. 115 of Wights contributions) must have
another name - as there already 2 or 3 other genere of the same name.
I propose to call it [Spharoscheenus?] - I may also notice that under
gen. 75, Nees has surely made a strange blunder in quoting them 
"Scleria triglomerate Mx" - what he obviously man is Scheenus
mariscoides Bigel. - I may likewise mention that Scripus planifolia
Sc.[Scirpus] Beeothryon (or pauciflorum)  & Sc. cespitosus seem to me [?]
to Scirpus than to Eleocharis, and that the [?] ovatin (cf [?])
is perhaps a district species from Eleoch obtusa (cf N. Americe) but it
does not differ generically : the [?] base of thee style is the same
[?] & colour but smaller in El. ovata : the style in E. ovata is bifid - in E. obtusa
trifid . The true Eleag. capitata I have from [?] from Drummond.
I see from Gray's 2 volumes which I have [?] from
Dr Hooker - provisionally indeed for he feared that the copy  was
[?] by another  & if so I must return mine) that you still
insist on Sc. trichodes being our Sc. acicularis - Surely you have
not examined the fruit, and position of the [?] carefully in both.
Yours is a species of Cheetocyperus - ours a species of Scirpidium 
yours have a triangular smooth nuts - ours an oblong [?] or nearly [?]
nut with several beautiful longitudinal [?] : yours had persistent bristles (hypog)
ours very deciduons ones so much so that I never saw more than [?]
teeth from which the bristles had fallen [?] in the state of the flower. 
have [?] from Drummond, from N. Orleans, a species of Scirpidium
which I believe to be Sc. tenue N. ab E. (It is L07 after N. O. coll - I suspect that
        