or SOUTHERN INDIA. 
15. Lamxa complaxata, E(j. PI. XII, Eig. 38. 
(39 
16. Lamna sigmoibes, Eg. PL XII, Eig. 39. 
The peculiarities of these species may he seen from the accompanying figures. 
As no specimens exist in our collection, I have nothing to add to Eger ton’s notice. 
17. Odoxtapsis oxypuiox, Eg. PI. XII, Eig. 40. 
This is distinguished from O. rliapliiodon hy the large lateral cusps heing more 
elongated and sharper at the points. 
18. Exenonrs seriiatus, Eg. PI. XII, Eig. 41. 
Egerton, 1. eit., p. 16G. 
Egerton, when examining three specimens of an Enchodiis from Mr. Kaye’s 
collection, says that they differ from those of E. halocgon, Ag., hy the surface of 
the enamel heing more smooth and even, in consequence of tlie fineness of the 
longitudinal striie, which in ludocyon are coarser and strongly marked. The trans- 
verse hands arc said to he broader and the form of the teeth less attenuated. The 
chief diilercnce rests in the finely serrated cutting edge, which in ludocyon is said 
to he smooth and entire. No figure is given of any of the specimens, all three 
heing said to he imperfect. 
Our collection possesses a single tooth from the neighhourhood of Karopandy 
in the Arrialoor group. It undoubtedly very closely resembles that of E. ludocyon, 
particularly the figures given hy Geinitz in Charact. etc., pt. iii, p. 63, pi. xvii, 
figs. 13-14, hut the longitudinal striation is finer, disappearing towards tlie pointed 
end and also towards the lateral margins. The enamel is, however, in our specimen 
unfortunately so much weathered off that no serration can be traced at the edges. 
The tooth is nearly an inch long. 
SAURIA. 
In his report on the geology of the Trichinopoly District (Mem. Geol. Surv., 
India, vol. iv, p. 139), Mr. H. E. Elanford mentions the occurrence of a Megalo- 
saurus tooth together with some hones in the Arrialoor beds at Gulhnoad. I have 
seen some fragments of these bones; they are, as 3Ir. Elanford remarks, so very 
fragile and imperfect that no reliable determination can he made, and unfortunately 
the solitary fragment of the tooth is not at present accessible, so that I am uuahle 
to add anything to the information given hy Mr. Elanford. 
s 
( 201 ) 
