
          one.


 There were two I was to keep -
 fragments of Chorizanthe from 
 California - they appear to me to be 
 C. [pembriata?] Nutt. (labelled C.[pectinola?]) 
 and C.[procumbius?] Nutt. from 
 Monterey without a name.


 I yesterday received yours of 
 28th May - I have not any working 
 materials by me. Hooker is about 
 for a short time and his curator 
 gone to the diggings so that I could 
 do nothing at Kew when I went 
 yesterday hoping to find him 
 returned. And there is no working 
 botanical establishement in London.
 But the specimens you send me 
 from Rio Grande valley Texas appear 
 to me to be [pentaudrous?] and 
 consequently [Solanverous?] to which 
 tribe indeed [?] unites all my 
 [Salpeglopeidea?] and he may be right.
 Your plant looks very much like a
        