t 
The following is » listing of all the fUbs received so far, 
April 18 and .May ?: On each date 1 container of film, apparently alre<f^ 
developed and sealed by Eastesan, 1 box canceled from Fair lami, M. J«, 
and I from ester, H, T. ^th held in Head Curator’s office. 
April 26s 1 cloth bag of fils via diplomatic pouch, containing 3 boxes of 
Ho, 365 film, 6 jrolls in film sacks, and a package of 35 k®. film. With 
the exception of 1, all of thes© lad been addressed prior to receipt here 
to the Kodak Processing Laboratory, 1350 CStie St, , M, I, , Washiiigton, D. C, 
All had the return {horae, not business) address .of George La Croix, 2122 
Mass, Ave, , M. W, Kiss Beets sent all of this film to the designated 
address with an aceoropanying letter on April 29. Un 18 Miss 3e®ts 
called Mrs. Porter of the Fells Church firsj ar4d was informed that she had 
received no black and idiite fito, Tlds infomation was iraparted to wm on 
Hay 18. 
I then called the 'Strauss PiKitoteclinical Service and tal.ked to Kr. 
Strauss, asking about filftis received frm th® Congo Expedition. He 
replied that they were all finei no trouble with any of the e»ieras 
apparerst from the pictures. He told m La Croix was not in the office but 
could be reached at his hom®, 2122 Mass, Ave, (Hu 3-?7l43)» Cm calling biM 
1 was told be had received no film Trc© either Schmitt or Sexton other 
than about 10 feet of ”fest strip," and that he had no knowledge of wiiat 
pictures Strauss had isentioned, ?h@ ne.xt Borning La Croix called me frosi 
his office and explained that the photos Strauss had told me were fine were 
not Scteaitt-Sexton itass at all, 
Kowever, as stated above, on April 29, 3 boxes of no, 365 films and 
film sacks no, 1, 2, 3» 8, 5, and 6 were sent by Miss Beets to the Service 
Bept,, Kodak Processing Co,, marked to be rotumed to "George La Croix, 
2122 Hass, Ave," Gn Hay 19, I talked on to Mr. Griffin of tl» 
^odak .Processing Co. , (La 6-li.071) and he cheeked his records and said 
[that on 3 he sent La Croix 3 boxes of 16 mm, films and on May 16 h® 
sent his h boxes (possibly aore) of 35 pm, color slides. 
To sum up, it appears tliat, unknown to Schmitt, Sexton made arrange- 
ments for the 'processing and inspection of films sent back from the field. 
This may or may not have any overtones of persojjal proprietary implications, 
We have knowledge of two shipiments of processed film going frmi the Kodak 
firm to La Croix, and La Croix’s denial of having received thejs. Aside 
frms the tw> packages mentioned in the sixth paragraph of this a.«*iioraridu», 
we have m otter filjBS here. 
Attached: Instructions frcwi 5 of Sclmitt letters. 
