and yielding meat resembling that of the king crab.” 
Probably it is a matter more or- less of choice since common 
and trade names are sometimes variable and inexact. On the other 
hand, proper terminology by us is rather important. It is hoped 
our reports will provide the background for the eventual establish- 
ment of a crab canning industry, and since Paralithodes platypus 
may be taken along with Paralithdoes camtschatica and canned 
together, it would be awkward if the two species could not be canned 
under the same label. 
I think all of the boys of the investigation staff feel that 
application of the term "king crab” to the species of Pc.ral i thodes 
taken commercially in Alaskan waters would be preferable, unless 
there is contrary biological precedent. ..e, therefore, would 
appreciate your expert opinion. 
We are rapidly bringing our preliminary report of the investi- 
gation to completion. This will include everything but the detailed 
biological material which will be worked up later and reported by 
the biologists. I expect to come to Washington for a short detail 
some time during the latter part of March and bring the complete 
manuscript with me. We will, of course, have a copy ior you and 
will want your criticism before it is submitted for publication. 
If you can give us your answer to the question on terminology 
by return air mail it will help us speed up our work. 
All the boys join me in sending our regards. 
Sincerely, 
R. W. Harrison, 
Technologist in Charge 
