3 
In conclusion I coasequeatly reoonsaond that Pr» Schmitt be 
notified that there appears to b© no reason for revoking the 
approval of the subocramlttee’s decision* 
I wwild furth®:* reeontaend that a copy cjf present commanicatio& 
be subadtted to Dr. Schmitt, wltti j'our reply to him. 
Very respectfully, 
N 
' /s/ L. Stejnager ' 
Hea€ Outrator, 
Dapt, of Biologsr#, 
