202 
Indiana University Studies 
(1815), 33-37; after Am. Navi- 
gation Act (1818), 64-68; after 
Am. Navigation Act (1820), 71- 
73; after Brit, legislation (1822) , 
103-104; after Brit, order in 
council (1826), 154-157; after 
“Reciprocity of 1830”, 186. 
Caicos Islands, and Am. Naviga- 
tion Act (1820), 70; and Am. 
Navigation Act (1830), 174. 
Calhoun, J. C., consulted regarding 
Monroe’s proclamation (1822), 
87. 
Cambreling, C. C., resolution re- 
garding Am. legislation (1823), 
117 ; connection with “Wilming- 
ton Conspiracy”, 164; chairman 
of Com. on Commerce, 173. 
Canada, and negotiations (1818), 
49; trade to B.W.I. via, 157. 
Canning, G., 135, 138, 153; letter 
regarding Am. retaliation, 85 ; 
reasons for Brit, acts (1825), 
106-107, 121 ; interpretation of 
Brit, acts (1825), 109-110; ne- 
gotiations with Gallatin, 128-132, 
146-148; becomes Prime Minis- 
ter, 152; influence in presidential 
campaign (1828) of his refusal 
to negotiate, 162. 
Canning, S., complaints against 
Monroe’s proclamation (1822), 
89-90; negotiations with J. Q. 
Adams, 90-94, 97-98; comment 
on Am. legislation (1823), 96-97; 
and negotiations (1824), 101-103. 
Cape Breton, and Am. Navigation 
Act (1820), 70; and proposed 
Am. legislation (1826-27), 137. 
Castlereagh, Lord, negotiations 
with J. Q. Adams (1816), 40-41; 
negotiations with J. Q. Adams 
and Rush (1817-18), 47-50; ad- 
vocates liberal commercial policy, 
54; negotiations with Gallatin 
and Rush (1818), 55-59,_ 63-64; 
comment on Am. Navigation Act 
(1820), 71; attitude toward U.S., 
130. 
Castries, St. Lucia, opened to re- 
ceive Am. goods, 68. 
Charleston, petition from, 14; 
meeting to consider commercial 
situation, 78. 
Clay, H., 120, 133, 134, 147, 165; 
view of Brit, acts (1825), 110- 
114; favors diplomacy rather 
than legislation (1825), 113; rea- 
son to account for failure of 
Cong, to legislate (1826), 117; 
delays instructions to R. King, 
118; decides U.S. should make 
concessions, 118; instructions to 
Gallatin, 118-119; attacked by 
Jacksonian opposition, 135; view 
regarding Adams’ proclamation 
(1827), 144; authorizes acquies- 
cence in Brit, decision, 149. 
Colleton, S. C., meeting to consider 
commercial situation, 78. 
Colonial Trade bill (1822), influ- 
ence of B.W.I. petitions on en- 
actment, 82-83 ; introduced by 
Robinson, 82; opposed by Brit, 
ship-owners, 83. 
Commercial convention (1815), 
failure to include B.W.I. trade, 
32; criticism of, in U.S., 33; ef- 
fect on Am. carrying-trade, 33- 
37 ; resultant demand in U.S. for 
countervailing legislation, 37-38, 
43-45. 
Commercial convention (1818), ne- 
gotiations leading to, 54-58; fail- 
ure to include B.W.I. trade, 59; 
comment in U.S., 59-60; com- 
ment in Brit. North Am., 60. 
Congress, legislation relating to B. 
W.I. trade (1790), 13; (1807), 
25; (1813), 27-28; (1817), 43- 
47; (1818), 50-53; (1820), 68- 
70; (1823), 94-97; (1827), 136- 
141; (1830), 173-174. 
Connecticut, governor’s message re- 
fers to commercial situation, 42. 
Crawford, W. H., consulted re- 
garding Am. Navigation Act 
(1820), 69. 
Crowinshield, J., urges retaliatory 
legislation, 23. 
Cuba, entrepot in B.W.I. trade, 72, 
156. 
Danish West Indies, entrepots in 
B.W.I. trade, 67, 71, 155, 156. 
Deane, S., advises Lord Sheffield of 
Am. commercial dependence on 
Great Britain, 9. 
Demerara, hostility in, toward Am. 
commercial interests, 30. 
Denmark, 104. 
Diplomacy, attempts to secure ac- 
cess to B.W.I. carrying-trade 
through, (1783), 8; (1786), 11; 
(1794), 15-19; (1802), 21-22; 
(1806), 23-25; (1815), 32; 
(1816), 40-41; (1817), 47-50; 
(1818-19), 54-64; (1823), 100- 
103; (1826-27), 118-119, 127- 
132, 146-154; (1829-30), 163- 
168, 171-173, 176-178, 184-186. 
Dominica, urges opening of ports 
to Am. ships, 30. 
