298 
Indiana University Studies 
Mus. Bull. 200:98, fig. 63 (1). Kinsey, 1920, Bull. Amer. Mus. 
Nat. Hist. 42: pi. 32, fig. 27. 
Holcaspis centricula Beutenmiiller in Smith, 1910, Ins. N.J.: 597. 
Diplolepis quercus-centricola Dalla Torre and Kieffer, 1910, Das Tier- 
reich 24: 369, 637, 811. 
Disholcaspis centricola Kinsey, 1920, Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 42: 
398. 
Diplolepis centricola Comstock, 1924, Introd. Ent. : 926. Weld, 1926 (in 
part), Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 68 (10): 23. Weld in Leonard, 1928, 
Ins. N.Y.: 969. 
FIG. 47. TWO VARIETIES OF CYNIPS CENTRICOLA 
Coastal Plain varieties possibly derived from more widespread, ancestral stock 
migrating out of Southwest. 
[NOT Holcaspis centricola err. det. M. T. Cook papers and resulting 
Indiana records, which are correctly Andricus singularis (Bassett).] 
FEMALE. — Head and thorax often with some rufous, sometimes 
largely bright rufous, the antennae with some rufo-piceous on the basal 
segments, sometimes with the basal segments wholly rufous; median 
groove only poorly indicated; the tip of the second abscissa of the radius 
distinctly and broadly triangulate; the marks at the apex of the cubital 
cell not abundant but often fused into chains. Figures 271, 284. 
GALL. — Usually well covered with rich red purple spots, occasion- 
ally unspotted; on leaves of Quercus stellata. 
RANGE. — New York: New York City (Angus in Amer. Mus. and 
Kinsey coll.). Farmingdale (W. T. Davis in Kinsey coll.). 
New Jersey: Fort Lee and New Brunswick (acc. Beutenmiiller in 
Smith 1910:597). Lakehurst (Beutenmiiller in Amer. Mus. and Kin- 
