564 
Indiana University Studies 
SUBGENUS ACRASPIS 
STRUCTURAL DETAILS 
Fig. 349. Tarsal claw, C. mellea Carolina, Richland, N.J., Q. stellata, 
Kinsey coll. Typical of Ashmead’s group Sphaeroteras. 
Fig. 350. Tarsal claw, C. mellea compta, paratype, Austin, Texas, Q . 
stellata, J. T. Patterson no. 138, in Kinsey coll. Claw less distinctly 
simple. 
Fig. 351. C. pezomachoides pezomachoides, Richland, N.J. Q. alba, 
Kinsey coll. Toothed claw of the species which is type of Acraspis. 
Figs. 352-353. Eggs, C. pezomachoides erinacei. Agamic form erinacei 
(fig. 352) and bisex. form bicolens (fig. 353). Redrawn after Trig- 
gerson. 
FRONT WINGS 
From adults uniformly enlarged to 50. mm., so wing-body ratios may be 
compared by direct comparisons of wing drawings 
Fig. 354. C. arida, holotype, Alpine, Texas, Q. grisea, Kinsey coll. 
Fig. 355. C. mellea compta, paratype, Austin, Texas, Q. stellata, J. T. 
Patterson no. 138, in Kinsey coll. 
Fig. 356. C. mellea mellea, holotype, Jacksonville, Florida, Q. stellata 
var., W. H. Ashmead, in U.S. Nat. Mus. 
Fig. 357. C. mellea bifurca, Fender, Georgia, Q. floridana, Kinsey coll. 
Wing-body ratio = 0.54. 
Fig. 358. C. mellea bifurca, holotype, Picayune, Miss., Q. stellata, W. E. 
Smith, in Kinsey coll. Wing-body ratio = 0.44. 
Figs. 359-360. C. mellea bifurca, paratypes, Picayune, Miss., Q. stel- 
lata, W. E. Smith, in Kinsey coll. Wing-body ratio = 0.34 (fig. 359) 
and 0.27 (fig. 360). 
Fig. 361. C. conica, holotype, Globe, Ariz., Q. grisea, Kinsey coll. 
