58 
ON A CRANIUM AND OTHER HUMAN BONES 
was able to reconstruct the skull, two humeri and two 
radii, and an ulna ; unfortunately, no femur or tibia could 
be restored, which fact renders the determination of the 
probable stature less easy than it might have been. 
The following are my measurements : — 
Cranium — Lengths. Glab.-max. 188 mm. Fronto-inial, 184. 
Glab. in., 184. Ophryo-max. 185. Face-lengths, 70 and 119. 
From Opisthion to lambda, 105. 
Breadths. Frontal minim. 97. Steph. 114. Pre-auric. 110. 
Maximum, 138. Mastoid (prominent point of curve), 127. 
Asterial, 110. Bigonial, 87. Breadth Index, 73’4. 
Height. Basio -bregmatic, 138. Ear-height, 120 ; this is 
somewhat doubtful : I cannot be sure of it. Height Index 
73-4. 
Circumf. horiz., 522. Sagittal. : Naso-inial, 130 -f 112 -f 
74 = 317. Sub-occip., 53. Foramen, 36 ( x 29). Basio- 
nasial, 102. Total, 508. Transverse, supra-auric, to centre of 
meatus over bregma 332. Total, 467. 
Nasal Length, 53*8. Breadth, 25. Index, 46*5, leptorrhine. 
Orbital Breadth, 38. Height, 31. Index, 81*6, microseme. 
Palatal Length, 55. Breadth, 34. 
Mandible. Depth of chin, 32. Length of Base, 83 ; of Ramus, 78. 
Stature by Manouvrier. 
By Pearson. 
Humerus 
Right 
330 
1657 
1661 
Left 
326 
1646 
1650 
Ulna 
271 
1696 
Radius 
Right 
247 
1666 
1661 
Left 
244 
1657 
1651 
Hum. 4- Rad. 
1654*6 
Means, about 
1664*4 
165*5 
= inches 65*53 
65*16 
Capacity, by Manouvrier’s method, 1505 c.c., or perhaps less. 
Welcker’s 3 methods, C 1481, D 1495x 1495, Mean 
1490*3. 
Pelletier’s .... 1490 
Beddoe’s .... 1490 
Pearson’s .... 1455, perhaps more. 
1 have used 115x2 as the divisor for Manouvrier’s 
plan ; but I suspect that the master himself would have 
used a larger one, the skull being dolichokephalic, and 
the glabella rather prominent. 116x2 would give a 
r<|uotient of 1492 c.c., when reduced to Flower’s standard. 
