SPECIMENS OF LYCIUM COLLECTED IN SOUTH AMERICA 
by H. H. Bartlett, determined by C. Leo Hitchcock 
19288 
20437 
19545 
19245 
20641 
20353 
20009 
20236 
20329 
20587 
19443 
20540 
19553 
19929 
19928 
19756 
19752 
19332 
20505 
L* chllense Mlers ex Bertero 
L. ovalllobum C. L. Hitchcock 
L. cestroldes Schlecht. 
L. cestroldes Schlecht. 
L, chllense Mlers 
Solanum 
L, Clllleslanum Mlers 
L. clllatum Schlecht. 
L. cuneatum U. Damme r 
L. chllense Mlers 
L. chllense Mlers closest? 
I am afraid of this one, It doesn’t fit any category In 
my key. I have very little material to check against 
here, so am none too sure of myself. Since I do not have 
a large series of L. chllense and L. clllatum , I am In- 
clined to wonder how so many diverse forms could be merged. 
It Is my guess that this plant Is undescrlbed It Is not 
the same as L. flmbrlatum . 
Grabowskla - I have no South American flora by which I can 
place this to species. 
L. elongatum Mlers 
L. Glllleslanum Mlers does key to fragosum 
L. chllense Mlers 
L. tenulsplnosum Mlers 
L. Tweedlanum Gris. 
(Probably) L. pubescens Mlers 
I cannot place this to my recollection, I have never seen 
anything quite like It. It suggests L. clllatum - but It 
doesn’t have the stamens of that group of species; Its 
flower Is that of L. ovalllobum (almost) but, vegetatlvely. 
It Is not at all similar to that species. I can’t name It. 
