247—70 INDIAN TERTIARY AND POST-TERTIARY VERTEBRATA. 
2. Amphicyon angustidens , 1 Marsh. Miocene, N. America. 
Known only by a fragment of the mandible : equal in size to a small fox. 
3. Amphicyon brevirostris 2 (Croiz.). Low. miocene, Clermont. 
Canis brevirostris, Croiz. Cams issiodorensis, Blain. 
Amphicyon issiodorensis, Blain. 
Dentition considerably smaller than that represented in woodcut fig, 8, B (p. 241). 
4. Amphicyon curtum , 3 Filhol. Quercy phosphorites. 
5. Amphicyon cuspigerus , 4 Cope. Miocene, N. America. 
A small species, with teeth about the size of those of A. vetus. 
6. Amphicyon dominans, 5 Myr. Miocene, Europe. 
A rather small, and apparently undescribed, species. 
7. Amphicyon entoptychi, 6 Cope. Miocene, N. America. 
About equal in size to the American kit fox ( Canis \_Vulpes~\ fulvns). 
8. Amphicyon eseri , 7 Plien. Miocene, Europe. 
An imperfectly known species. 
9. Amphicyon giganteus , 8 Laur. Miocene, France. 
A very large species of which only m. 1 and a canine are known : the transverse 
diameter of the former is 1*5 inches : the species is considered by De Blainville as 
probably identical with A. major, 
10. Amphicyon hartshornianus, 9 Cope. Miocene, N. America. 
About the size of the coyote ( Canis ochropus) ; with the molars relatively small. 
11. Amphicyon helveticus , 10 Pictet and Humbert. Miocene, Switzerland. 
A provisional species, with teeth considerably smaller than those of the wolf ; is said 
to present certain resemblances to Hycenodon. 
12. Amphicyon intermedius , 11 Myr. Mid. miocene, Europe. 
A large species, with a trenchant outer cusp to the talon of mY, and the premolars very 
small and widely separated. 
13. Amphicyon lemanensis, 12 Pomel. Miocene, France. 
A. blainvillei, Gerv. A. lepiorhynchus, Pomel. 
A. elaverensis, Gerv. A. minor, Blain (in parte). 
A. gracilis, Pomel. Cynelos langengis, Jourd. 
A microdont and meionocreodont species, with a skull about the size of that of the 
wolf. 
I ‘ Amer. Journ.,’ 3rd ser., vol. II., p. 124. 2 Blainville, “ Osteographie,” Gen. Canis. pi. XIII. 
3 ‘ Comptes Rendus,’ vol. XCI., p. 344. The writer has had no opportunity of seeing this notice. 
4 ' Bui. U. S. Geol. Surv.,’ vol. VI., p. 178. 
5 ‘ N. Jahrh.,’ 1843, p. 388: according to Peters (‘ Dentes . k. Ac. Wissens. Wien,' math. nat. Cl., vol. XXIX., 1869, 
p. 191), the species is only known hy this preliminary notice. 
6 ‘ Pro. Am. Phil. Soc.,’ vol. XVIII., p. 371. t ‘ Wurtemh , Jahreshb.,’ vol. V„ p. 216, pi. I. 
8 Blainville, “ Osteographie.” Gen. Subursus, pi. XIV. {A. d’Avaray). 9 ‘Bui. U. S. Geol. Surv.,’ op. cit. 
10 Pictet, “ Paleontologie Suisse,” vol. V., p. 135. 
II Suess, “ Tiber Amphicyon intermedius von Tuchoric in Bohmen ” (‘ Sitz. k. Ac. Wissens. TPien-, ’vol. XLIII., p. 224) • 
and Peters (“ Zur Kenntniss der Wirbelthiere aus den Miocanschicten von Eibiswald ”)— 1 1 Denies, tc. Ac. Wisscn. Wien,' 
math. nat. Cl., vol, XXIX., 1869, p. 190, pi. III. 
12 Filhol, “ Notes sur' quelques Mam. Foss, etc.,” p. 2, pi. I. 
