
          is not [Chara? flexilis?].  That Prunus, which I hoped
might be P. [moratima?], I found more than was a more
[took me by ..?]. it was no set out as the same
was found about in the woods [fruit?] unpleasant,
sour.  This is all I know.  [Mill....]
I misnamed - I have [ Ory..?] in my head, that
I presume, I always write it B. [rounosa?]. I am
glad you too are, for 2 short probably have done
no more.  I like you, name [?] but still, in
short both will it be found.  Eaton will have it,
M. roumosa, I presume.  About [?]
I have little to say.  I have no doubt that C. granulous,
is not in [Murh. or Ph.?], just give Mx. a look for
it & if it is not there, name it after the discoverer.
I am still puzzled about that C. upholophora.  That
C. otigocopha found in the woods has [nearly/neatly?]round,
obovate fruit, but the other has fruit more 3 - sided,
& almost invariably longest at the base.  This diff. I ob
served when I picked the specimens, & they were
[?] & [?].  I do not yet think those two can both
be [C. disp?] - one is solitary, on dry land, straight,
[?] & the [spikes?] close, and many more & not of
exactly the same shop; the other rather [?] & often
fully so, slender, procumbent, flexible, [spikes?] [?] &
[?] fruit few, generally 2 or 3 & so on.  The look
exceedingly difft.  Whose Bryum argenteum & [?]
did I send in a letter? The plants I know. [?]
is another moss, which I wish to know - it has grown
[?], grows in high [situations?] I believe in Vermont.
Those crystals in your [?], I had no doubt, were
chromate of iron - why should Nuttall use the [barbarism?]
[chromatic?] iron, which has no meaning in any language.
        