
          240. [?] is C. longirostris, [T.?]. I wrote it so
to him before you published it.

241. [?]. Why is name altered?

256. [atherodes?]. why [alter?]? name used before? Because
mine was before - this is it - & keeps
my name.

In the Arctic Carices was one I called C.
polytrichoides; see if it is not C. [attumales?] of
R. Br. I think it is; or, rather, it is his C.
affinis. In the letter, kindly giving [me?] R. Br. species
by Dr. Gray, this is no C. attenuata. Do write me all
about this species, & [?] & look and see if C. Drummondiana
is not the one. I think it is. Be so good as to look
too at all those I called C. [simpoidea?], & see if most
are not C. Drummondiana. Since you gave me that
one in N. Y., I [fear?] about this.

C. oligocarpa from Lexington Ky., which you
have, is [this?] [time?] [one?] of Schk. but not of Muh.
And the one of Muh. or rather in Muh. collection,
is, I suspect, the C. digitalis.

No. 162. pulla of Gooden. in Sprengel is not
C. membranacea, or like it.

In great haste, Your friend

C. D.
        