
          me, the fruit is lenticular indeed,
but only at all on that.
I am not clear that the White
Mt. plant is that of Mx.

But, I have hurried, what I began
to think, what I called C. concolor
R. Br. & returned to you as
such long ago, in Hoo [Lin's?]
carices, is the real C. lenticularis,
you sent me. Boott
called C. concolor R. Br. the same
as C. caespitosa; but, it was
not, & he had not then got
out of the fog on C. caespitosa.
My C. concolor, as I called it, is exactly
Boott's Illust. of C. lenticularis
Mx. My old species
was from Bear Lake also, &
collected by Richardson.

You, sent me C. [?]
Willd., Stan. & pistillata,
exactly what he figd. in Hooker's
Carices tab. 216, & which
he quotes in the Illust. no. 68.
& yet he denies its being dioccioous,
& call my description
        