268 
m ) q ( & 
Caf» i. £ = i68. 30, 41, 41. 
y = 2 + 87 1 9", 10 — 6400", 27 — 1 843", 70 
— H44 > oî — 573^80 — 6432 /, ,59 = % — 
*3* 33"» *7 = l6 3* 30. 4-1, 41 “ (3- 38- 53» V-) 
= 164. 5t. 43, 14; unde, ope formulae T4 v_ 
I — e 
— . T 4 y, oritur v = 14. 4. 39, 16. Sed 
T -+* e 
esfe debet v = 25. 29. 47, 10; ergo error = — 
11.25.7,94. 
Caf. 2. z = 90. o. o. 
y = % + 4377^'» 9 1 * + 3^5 6 % *8 * — 680 i'\ 
67 ~ = z -h 40231 '3 42 = 90.0.0. -f- ii. io. 31 42 
s= 101. 10. 31, 42; unde v — 2. 17. 14, 32. Sed 
accurate eft v = 6. 36. 6, 345 ergo error = — 
4. Ig. 5^ 3 
Caf. 3. z - 179. 22. 35, 19 
y = z ~h 47^» 4 2 — 356", 85 — * o6' v , 29 
— 87 »43 — 3 6 9"»94 — 449 /, »8 i = z ~ 893">9o 
= I79> 22. 35, u) — (o. 14. 53,90) = 179. 7. 
41, 29; unde v = 130. 14. 12,18- Sed per meth. 
inv. eft v — 90. c. c; ergo error — + 40. 14. 12, 1 8* 
Errores igitur, qui per Formulam vulgarem 
erant — 18.53. 53» i.7î “ 49-M9»9 6 ; 79- 6 -3°>- 1 ; 
ope Formulae §. 7. prodeunt — 11. 25. 7, 94*, 
— 4. 18. 52,02; — 40. 14. 12, i8- 
Patet itaq e esfe utrinsque methodi in hac 
orbita aberrationem permagnam, & minime fe- 
rendam; hanc tamen in vulgari, quam in For* 
mula §:phi 7., esfe majorem; quemadmodum et- 
jam 
