Holland.] 
70 
May 7, 
of G. Symethus , Cram., but a careful comparison with specimens 
of Symethus , agreeing with the descriptions and figure of authors, 
convinces me of the fact that this is an undescribed species, to 
which, because it so greatly exceeds in size any others of the ge- 
nus known to me, I give the name maximus. 
Genus Allotinus, Feld. 
71. A. major , Feld. Reise Nov. Lep. n, p. 286, PI. xxxv, figs. 
29-31. ^,9. 
This species does not seem to be constant in the markings of the 
upper surface. One of the males sent me by Mr. Doherty is with- 
out the white markings on the disk of the primaries which are so 
conspicuous in Felder’s figure. 
72. A. obscurus , Roeber, Corr. Blatt Ent. Ver. “Iris,” No. 3, 
p. 52, PI. iv, fig. 8. J . 
Genus Paragerydus, Dist. 
73. P. Macassar ensis, n. sp., PI. IV, fig. 5. 
9 . Costa strongly arched, external margin of the primaries ev- 
enly rounded, external margin of secondaries sharply scalloped. 
Upper surface uniformly dark fuscous, with two very small, sub- 
apical white spots upon the costa. Fringes of the secondaries nar- 
row and light gray in color. Under surface milk white, profusely 
speckled with fuscous dots and lines, of which the largest form an 
ill-defined marginal and submarginal series. Expanse, 38 mm. 9 . 
Type in Coll. Holland. 
Genus Pitheeops, Horsfield. 
74. P. Phoenix , Roeber, Corr. Blatt Ent. Ver. “ Iris,” No. 3, p. 
61, PI. iv, fig. 26. <? , 9 . 
Genus Cyaniris, Dalman. 
75. C. sp? 
I received several males and females of a species of Cyaniris 
which are closely allied to C. Lambi , Dist., but I cannot pronounce 
with any degree of certainty upon them until I know more of the 
facts as to the life-history and haunts of these animals. I am much 
inclined to think that a good deal of the work done in the erection 
of new species in this group, will be found to have been like that 
which was done a few years ago in the case of our own L. Pseudar- 
