575 
The market valuation 
apportioned as follows : — 
of the estate has, in the table, been 
25 acres 10 year old rubber at 
b42i= 35,535 
72 % 
„ 9 
„ 
„ 
1,244= 90,790 
375 
„ 8 
tt 
tt 
1,066=399,762 
65 
,, 7 
rt 
tt 
888= 57,744 
30 
» 6 
tt 
it 
7n= 21,320 
150 
„ 5 
tt 
ft 
5 10= 76,620 
440 
„ 4 
tt 
tt 
333 = 146,576 
962% 
„ 3 
ft 
tt 
200 = 192,375 
1,424 
„ 2 
tt 
tt 
111=158,120 
1,027% 
„ I 
„ 
„ 
53= 54,767 
6 , 709 % 
Jungle 
Total = Market valuation 
3= 20,157 
- 1,253,766 
It is quite likely that many readers whose knowledge entitles 
them to express an authoritative opinion may not approve of the exact 
ratio of the apportionment; but the table has been so arranged 
that any reader may mentally readjust the figures to his own liking. 
If the older rubber is to be placed at a higher figure, the younger 
rubber must be put down at a lower value, and vice versa. 
It may be of interest to note that the price at which the Lanadron 
property was sold to the public in 1907 is quoted in the prospectus as 
follows 
22^ 
acres 8 % year old rubber at 
190 = 4,275 
2^ 
,, 8 
tt 
„ 
180= 450 
30 
„ 7 % 
„ 
„ 
170= 5,100 
42 Vz 
„ 7 
tt 
, , 
160= 6,800 
25 2% 
„ 6 % 
tt 
150=37,875 
122^ 
„ 6 
tt 
„ 
140=17,150 
45 
„ 5 % 
„ 
» 
130= 5,850 
20 
„ 5 
tt 
,, 
120= 2400 
10 
» 4% 
tt 
H 
100= 1,100 
20 
,, 4 
tt 
„ 
100= 2,000 
150 
tt 3 
„ 
60= 9,000 
150 
•„ 2 H 
„ 
,, 
45= 6,750 
250 
„ 2 
„ 
„ 
35= 8,750 
300 
„ *■% 
tt 
25= 7,500 
602^ 
„ I 
tt 
„ 
15= 9,037 
b337 
„ under 1 
tt 
„ 
10=13,370 
6,866 
„ Virgin jungle 
,» 
3 = 20,598 
534 
„ Secondary jungle 
2= 1,063 
Total 
... 
159,073 
\° 
and it will be remembered that the shares went to a substantial pre- 
mium immediately on flotation. 
Particulars of catch-crops and interplanting have been fully 
detailed in the remarks column of the table. Interplanted crops 
frequently retard the growth of rubber, and, although their cultivation 
may in some instances lead to the payment of dividends before the 
rubber comes into bearing, their value is to some extent doubtful, 
and no allowance has been made for them in the calculations. What- 
ever benefit may accrue from interplanted crops may be regarded as 
an additional advantage, which may favourably influence the investor 
in his choice. 
