OF NEBULA AND CLUSTERS OF STARS. 
27 
No. 
2591 h. 1000=111. 616. The star 6m, 5' n only noticed by W.H. The other 7m, f in 
the parallel only by h. Are there really two stars % and are they both variable 1 
2597 h. 1002=1. 203. Auwers, in consequence of an erratum in P.T. (see List of Errata), 
makes the R.A. of this nebula 7 m too small. The error is corrected in the 
Register (H. 1889) and in C.H.’s reduction. 
2604 h. 1009=1. 202. The same misprint in P.T. mentioned in the last note on 
h. 2597 has also vitiated M. Auwers’s R.A. of this nebula. It is corrected in 
the Register Sheet (H. 1886) and in C.H. 
2608 h. 1013=111. 381. I adopt Mr. Marth’s identification of these nebulae. The 
place of III. 381 in the catalogue of C.H., from which my working lists were 
made out, is vitiated by some great mistake. The P.D. is supposed to be 
derived from 1 Comae, the neb. being 1° 12' south of the star. This, however, 
would give 68° 9' 29" for 1830 instead of 65° 45' 0", that brought up from C.H. 
2650 h. 1039. This cannot be identical with h. 1036, and its brightness precludes its 
being accepted as III. 354. But there is extreme uncertainty as to its P.D. 
The degree may even be wrong. 
2652 h. 1041=11. 733. According to W.H. the position of extension is “near the 
meridian.” If meridian be not a mistake fox parallel it has changed, h. has a 
measure 62°-3, and an estimation 65° in another observation. 
2653 h. 1042. This cannot be III. 3, as C.H. has reduced two obs. of this latter well 
agreeing, and giving a R.A. 2 m exceeding that of h. 1042, which also rests on 
2 obs. of h. 
2668 h. 1050 = 1. 253. The difference of descriptions is extraordinary, so that they 
seem hardly to pertain to the same object; but the places agree. 
h. 1062, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 1070, 1, 3, 5, III. 391, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. The places set down 
for the nebulae of this extensive group are made out by a most careful consider- 
■ ation of all the observations and records in the sweeping books which seem 
irreconcileable with a group of six nebulae only. The group, however, needs a 
thorough re-examination. 
2684 
2685 
2686 
2689 
2690 
2693 
2694 
2697 
2699 
2701 
2702. 
2730 II. 14. Owing to an erratum in P.T. (see List of Errata) Auwers gives quite an 
erroneous place for this nebula (ll h 39 m 27 s R.A., 81 Q 9' P.D. 1830). 
2747 h. 1103=111. 814. Auwers suspects some error of the press, since his P.D. for 
1830 comes out 36° 58', while that of h. 1103 is 35° 56'. There is, however, 
e 2 
