OF NEBULA AND CLUSTEES OE STAES. 
33 
No. 
3358 See note on 3337. 
3363 V. 3. Auwers makes the E.A. of this neb. for 1830 13 h 2 m 31 s , which is 10 m too 
great. The P.T., which in this instance is correct, makes it follow 75 Leonis 
yii 44 m . 
3393 h. 1527. This is not impossibly III. 937, but as both E.A.’s and P.D.’s differ very 
much, they may be different, and are therefore separately stated. 
3415 h. 1535. Not seen by Lord Eosse in one observation ; clouds passing h. has two 
observations, both agreeing well. 
3420 See note on No. 3337. 
3421 II. 185. Auwers, misled by an error in P.T. (see List of Errata), makes the E.A. 
of this neb. too small by 10 m . 
3426 Auw. N. 31. Not visible in the Konigsberg Heliometer. 
3483 See note on No. 3337. 
3506 II. 22. P.D. extremely doubtful. 
3512 II. 826. Place re-reduced by the star used by H. and A.S.C. 
3527 h. 1597=11. 314. Auwers makes A. E.A. H. — h. = + 107 s , and remarks that 
there is perhaps some error in P.T. This is the case (see List of Errata), and 
with the correction there indicated the agreement is satisfactory. 
3550 D’Arr. 94. D’Arrest says “ not found again, Feb. 19, 1863. Sky perfectly clear. 
Perhaps a comet.” 
3588 h. 1633=111. 926. II. says it is sp a considerable star. h. has “ a #9m with a 
very dilute nebulous atmosphere.” Has the star or the nebula moved % 
3650 III. 946. Auwers makes the declination +89° 17', a misprint for -f-80° 17'. 
3662 h. 1674=1. 255. Evidently ill seen by h. The description of LI. preferred. 
3664|h. 1676, 1679=111. 422, 423. Auwers makes the P.D. 12' too great by reason 
3668) of an erratum in P.T. (see List of Errata). 
3728 h. 1720=111. 666. Auwers finding A. E.A. LI. — h. = + 52 s , supposes a mistake of 
l m . Examined sweep 146 (h.), and found all clearly written and right reduced. 
3750jh. 1734, 1735 = 11. 309, 310. IL. says the second is the larger, h. the smaller of 
3751) the two. 
3760 
3762 
3763 
3764 
3766 
3767 
3770 
3771 
3773 
3774 
h. 1744=M. 101, and its attendants in more or less intimate nebulous connexion. 
Of those in Lord Eosse’s woodcut, P.T. 1861, p. 729, N, the principal nucleus, 
is No. 3770=h. 1774; ni =No. 3774=1744, i; n 2 No. 3773=1744, h. The 
others are not lettered, and are made out from the joint evidence of this dia- 
gram and the measures of position and distance of the stars compared with the 
copper plate, fig. 35. — 1744, a is not improbably = III. 787. 
MDCCCLXIV. 
F 
