386 
E. puheruleiita. K, Enfield 6, Lanarth 10 (also B) ; S, Islcsw. . 1 1. 8 
E. re.sinilf.ra. G, Glaanevin; B, Rostrcvor. 
E. nibida. K, Glasncvin, Wakel.urst. 
E. Smithii. K, Glasnevin. 
E. stellulala. V, Rostrevor. 
E. Stuartiana. K, Hargham Kew 5; (/, Glasncvin ; B, Enlield 10. 
E. nrnigera. K Hargham 5, Hayling Island 6 (and B). Headfort (two plants U) ; G, Tortwortb 7 ; 
S, Glasnevin, Enfield, Lanarth 10, Leonardslee 5 (injured in l'.08), Lyndhurst G, Wakehurst; V, Rostrcvor. 
E. ff.nm-o.oa. U, Enfield, Rostrevor, Vckdeld, Wakehurst, 
E. riminali*. K, Hoadfort, Leonardslec 5: G, Glasncvin (also B). 
E. whiliingclintneiisi*. K, Aldenham (also B) ; G, Colesborne 10: ,S', Enfield 12, Glasnevin, Kew 20; 
V, Wakehurst 12. 
"Tenderness of Eucalypti" (in Cumberland).--/?, coccifera, E. urnigera, E. 
Mueller! (from Tasmania). (Gard. Citron., 14th August, 1920, p. 85.) 
INDIA. 
The Forest Reports issued by the central and local Governments in India will 
furnish many details in regard to the success, or the reverse, of Eucalyptus in that 
Empire. See also Kew Report for 1879, p. 16, on Eucalyptus in India. 
Mr. J. E. OTonor wrote a report (fcp., 8 pp., Dept. of Revenue, Agriculture 
and Commerce Forests, India, 1874. printed 22nd August, 187G) entitled "Note on 
the cultivation of the Eucali/ptus globulus and other Australian Gums in India." 
This is a useful historical resume, chiefly dealing with E. globulus, though a few 
other species are touched upon. After speaking of the extensiveness of the test, he 
goes on to say, " The experiment has not been particularly successful, and, in fact, it 
may be said that the trees have lived only in two places the Nilgiris and Raniket." 
Then we have a note to the same Department for the year 1876, but actually 
printed before Mr. O'Conor's report. It is entitled " On the cultivation of the different 
species of Eucalyptus in Northern India," by 1). Brandis, Inspector-General of Forests. 
He says his remarks should be read in connection with those of Mr. O'Conor. 
He recommends that no time or money should be wasted on experiments with E. globulus 
on the plains of India. The desirability of experimenting with other species is discussed, 
but Mr. Gamble's notes (below) seem to render a further abstract of Dr. Brandis' paper 
not now necessary. 
" Cultivation of the Eucalyptus in Northern India," is an 8vo pamphlet of 
twenty-three pages, published by the Government Central Press, Calcutta, on 23rd 
January, 1882. It consists of a mass of official correspondence (chiefly military), 
and includes the reports of Mr. O'Conor and Dr. Brandis already referred to. Ti;e 
correspondence has now only historical value. 
J. S. Gamble, in his " Manual of Indian Timbers " (1902 ed.), p. 352, says : 
It is probable that, the earliest attempts to grow the Eucalypts in India were those made on the 
Nilghiri Hills in 1813 by Captain Cotton, who planted E. ylobulu* at Ootacamund on the estates known aa 
Oayton Park and Woodcot. He was followed in 1856 by General Morgan, and the first Governmei.t 
