23 
Comparative Measurement of Skeletons 
' 
Corythr 
osaurus 
casu- 
arius 
Brown 
A.M. 
N.H 
speci- 
mens 
Mm. 
Length, scapula 
880 
Width, blade of scapula. , 
200 
Length, humerus . ....... ...... 
585 1 
Length, radial crest. 
310 
Length, ulna 
660 
Length, radius. 
635 
Length, Me and digit III. .... 
410 
Length, Me II. 
216 
Length, Me III 
260 
Length, Me IV. 
253 
Length, Me V 
102 
Illium, length 
1,035 
205 
1,000 
490 
Illium, height, anterior peduncle. . . . 
Pubis, complete length 
Pubis, length, anterior blade 
Pubis, depth, anterior blade ........ 
270 
Pubis, narrowest depth, blade 
100 
Ischium, greatest length ...... ... 
1,030 
220 
Length, terminal foot 
Least vertical diameter. ...... ...... 
60 
Length , femur 
1,080 
1,000 
950 
Length , tibia . ...................... 
Length . fibula 
Length , Mi. II 
310 
Length , Mt,. Ill 
380 
Length, Mt. IV ... ........ 
320 
Coryth- 
osaurus 
casu- 
arius 
G.S.C. 
8532 
Coryth- 
osauTus 
excav- 
atus 
G.S.C. 
8676 
Coryth- 
osaurus 
inter- 
medins 
Roy. 
Out. 
Mus. 
mounted 
skeleton 
Coryth- 
osaurus 
inter- 
medins 
G.S.C. 
8704 
Lambe- 
osaurus 
clavin- 
itialis 
G.S.C. 
8703 
Paras- 
aurolo- 
phm 
walkeri 
Parks 
Type 
speci- 
men 
Mm. 
Mm. 
Mm. 
Mm. 
Mm. 
Mm. 
810 
600 
930 
820 
?850 
940 
175 
150 
203 
248 
530 
450 
540 
460 
520 
520 
280 
260 
298 
310 
650+ 
570 
700 
670 
660 
560 
640 
535 
635 
605 
618 
485 
375 
320 
390 
330 
415 
215 
185 
220 
220 
173 
255 
215 
260 
205 
208 
240 
208 
240 
250 
195 
90 
100 
90 
1,035 
1,015 
245 
890 
/894 
450 
516 
230 
260 
100 
890 
1,065 
1,070 
180 
§8 
1,040 
890 
1,050 
1,020 
1.032 
980 
813 
990 
1,000 
775 
940 
940 
270 
320 
270 
300 
Measurements of the fore limb of this species are taken from a second specimen which Mr. Brown 
states is the same size as the type. 
REFERENCES CITED 
1. Brown, B.: Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 32, art. 20, pp. 395-406 (1913). 
2. Brown, B„: Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 33, art. 35, pp. 559-565 (1914). 
3. Brown, B.: Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 35, art. 38, pp. 709-716 (1916). 
4. Gilmore, C. W.: Can. Field-Nat., vol. 37, pp. 46-7 (March. 1923). 
5. Gilmore, C. W.: Geol. Surv., Canada, Bull. 38, pp. 29-34 (1934). 
6. Gilmore, C. W.: Bull. A. M. N. H., New York, vol. 67, art. 2, Fig. 22 (1933). 
7. Lambe, L, M.: The Ottawa Naturalist, vol. 28, pp. 17-20 (April, 1914). 
8. Lambe, L. M.: The Ottawa Naturalist, vol. 30, pp. 117-123 (1917). 
9. Lambe, L. M.: The Ottawa Naturalist, vol. 31, pp. 135-139 (February, 1918). 
10. Lambe, L. M.: Geol. Surv., Canada, Mem. 120, pp. 67-77 (1920). 
11. Nopcsa, Baron F.:Palaeobiologica Band 2, pp. 187-201 (1929). 
12. Osborn, H. F.: Mem. A.M.NH. (NJ3.), vol. 1, pt. 2 (1912). 
13. Parks, W. A.: Univ. of Toronto Studies No. 13 (1922). 
14. Parks, W. A.: Univ. of Toronto Studies No. 15 (1923). 
15. Parks, W. A.: Univ. of Toronto Studies No. 31 (1931). 
16. Sternberg, C. M.: Geol. Surv., Canada, Bull. 44, p. 80 (1926). 
