1881. J 
24:7 
G. sjjurceUa, II. -S. — One, rather waited, June 12th, at Ponte de 
Morcellos. 
G . malvella, Hub. — One, somewhat worn, May 10th, on the hill 
S.E. of Silves. 
G. ?. — A single specimen, rather worn, May 21st, at an 
elevation of 2150 feet, at a waterfall at the foot of the last slope of 
Foia, near Monchique. It seems rather allied to G. viduella , but I 
should not like to describe a new species from a single specimen, which 
is not in first-rate condition. 
Teleia tamariciella , Zell. — One, May 17th, by the streamlet to the 
west of Silves. 
Ptocheuusa inojpella , Zell. — One, May 14th, between Sao Bartho- 
lomeu do Messines and Silves. 
Parasia castiliella , Moesckler. — One, May 14tli, between Sao 
Bartholomeu do Messines and Silves, by the road-side in cultivated 
lands. The specimen is rather greasy, but seems to agree perfectly 
with Moeschler’s description, and it does not accord with any other 
Parasia that I know. 
Anacampsis vorticella, Scop. — Five specimens, June 23rd, on the 
slope above the Corgo, near Villa Real. 
Cleodora lineatella, Zell. — One, May 16th, on the hill S.E. of 
Silves. 
JYothris limbipunctella , Staudinger P. — A very worn specimen is 
probably referable to this species. It was taken May 10th by the 
stream near Aldea do Neuves. 
Pleurota bicostella , Clerck. — One, June 30th, on the hills above 
Salamonde. 
P. ericella, Dup. — Three specimens, May 6th, at Almodovar ; May 
10th, near Aldea do Neuves ; and May 17th, on the hill south of Silves, 
in dry waste places. 
Harjpella Staintoniella , Zell. ?, aberr. or n. sp. One, in very fine 
condition, May 20th, in a chestnut wood on the slopes of Picota, at ail 
elevation of 1600 to 1700 feet. This is about the most interesting speci- 
men in the whole batch of Portuguese Tineina. The costal spot, instead 
of being triangular and broadest on the costa, is slender and oblique, its 
two sides being nearly parallel ; the dorsal spot is also smaller than in 
Staintoniella and Geojfrella ; the connecting silver streak between the 
two spots, and the absence of the apical black streaks, show this insect 
to be more nearly related to Staintoniella than to GeoJJ'rcll a. It would 
be hazardous to describe a new species in this genus from a single 
