146 BROOKLYN MUSEUM SCIENCE BULLETIN 3. 3. 
Female: Last ventral segment arcuate at apex; last dorsal segment 
arcuate at apex but narrowly incised at middle; lower vaginal plate 
(pi. V, fig. 19) wider than in emarginata. 
Alberta : Edmonton (Carr ex Chagnon) . 
Wyoming: Como. (O. Dietz coll.). 
Manitoba: Aweme, July (Criddle); Husavick, July (Wallis). 
Ontario: Nepigon (Ent. Branch, Ont.). 
Michigan: White Fish Point (Hubbard and Schwarz). 
Wisconsin: Dane Co., June (Marshall). 
Maine: Monmouth, Wales and Paris, June (Frost); Orono (Parshley) ; 
Cumberland Co., May (Nicolay). 
Massachusetts: Framingham and Hopkinton, June (Frost); Cumming- 
ton, May (Knab); Ipswich River, May (Emmerton, sifting). 
Connecticut: Suffield, May (Zappe). 
New York: Suffern (Schaeffer); Keene Valley, July (N. Y. State coll.); 
Wyandanch, Long Island, April (Shoemaker, sifting) ; Orient, Long 
Island, October (Schott). 
New Jersey: Centerton, June (Liebeck); New Foundland, May (Davis). 
Pennsylvania: Starlight, June (Shoemaker). 
The specimens collected by me at Suffern several years ago were 
swept from grasses and weeds growing in a low, moist meadow near a 
small creek. 
This is the species Dr. Leconte identified wrongly as cuprea Kirby 
and both names are made at present synonyms of pusilla Say but the 
latter and fulvipes are certainly very distinct from each other. In regard 
to the true cuprea of Kirby remarks will be found under quadricollis Say. 
In 19 19 I called attention to the distinctness and also wrong identifi- 
cation of this species, which was considered to be the same as pusilla and 
suggested that it is probably dives Lee. But later when I studied 
Lacordaire's description of fulvipes the specimens seemed to fit his 
description better, especially in regard to the coloration of antennae. 
However, the few specimens I had at that time possessed no impressed 
median line of prothorax, which Lacordaire describes as "le sillon dorsal 
est large, assez profond," etc. When I received specimens of shoemakeri, 
the small variety of flavipes, having a rather wide and deep median line 
of prothorax, I considered these to be fulvipes and as the other species 
was then unnamed I called it in manuscript mimetica. When I returned 
the British Museum material Mr. Bryant wrote me that the specimens 
labelled fidvipes are different from the type, but the specimens labelled 
mimetica are very close to the type of fidvipes, in fact, are only larger. 
