Gill Arches of Teleostean Fishes — Nelson 
407 
Fowler, H. W. 1936. The marine fishes of 
West Africa. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., vol. 
70, pt. 1, vii -J- 605 pp., 275 figs. 
Gill, T. 1890^ The osteological characteristics 
of the family Anguillidae. Proc. U. S. Natl. 
Mus. 13:157-160. 
1890 A The osteological characteristics 
of the family Synaphobranchidae. Proc. U. S. 
Natl. Mus. 13:161-164. 
1890c. The osteological characteristics 
of the family Muraenidae. Proc. U. S. Natl. 
Mus. 13:165-170. 
1890 d. Osteological characteristics of 
of the family Muraenesocidae. Proc. U. S. 
Natl. Mus. 13:231-234. 
1890c. The osteological characteristics 
of the family Simenchelyidae. Proc. U. S. 
Natl. Mus. 13:239-242. 
Ginsburg, I. 1951. The eels of the northern 
Gulf Coast of the United States and some 
related species. Texas J. Sci. 3:431-485, figs. 
1 - 16 . 
Gosline, W. A. 1950. The osteology and rela- 
tionships of the echelid eel, Kaupichthys 
diodontus. Pacific Sci. 4: 309-314, 7 figs. 
1951^. The osteology and classification 
of the ophichthid eels of the Hawaiian Is- 
lands. Pacific Sci. 5:298-320, 18 figs. 
1951 A Chilorhinus brocki, a new eche- 
lid eel from Hawaii, with notes on the classi- 
fication of the order Anguillida. Copeia 
1951:195-202, 1 fig. 
1952. Notes on the systematic status of 
four eel families. J. Washington Acad. Sci. 
42:130-135, 2 figs. 
Herre, A. W. 1953. Check list of Philippine 
fishes. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Serv. Res. 
Rept. 20, 977 pp. 
Hofer, H. 1945. Zur Kenntnis der Suspension- 
formen des Kieferbogens und deren Zusam- 
menhange mit dem Bau des Knochernen 
Gaumens und mit der Kinetik des Schadels 
bei den Knochenfischen. Zool. Jahrb. (Anat.) 
69:321-404, 21 figs. 
Holler, F. 1935. Funktionelle Analyse des 
Hechtschadels. Morphol. Jahrb. 76:279-320, 
11 figs. 
Holstvoogd, C. I960. The importance of the 
retractores arcuum branchialium for the clas- 
sification of teleostean fishes. Bull. Aquatic 
Biol. 2:49-50. 
1965. The pharyngeal bones and mus- 
cles in Teleostei, a taxonomic study. Proc. 
Koninkl. Nederl. Akad. Wetens. Ser. C, 
68:209-218, 12 figs. 
Jang, C-Y. 1957. Studies on the skeleton of 
Muraenesox cinereus (Forskal). [In Chinese 
with English summary.] Acta Zool. Sinica 
9:110-119, 5 pis. 
Jaquet, M. 1920. Contribution a 1’anatomie du 
Simenchelys parasiticus Gill. Result. Camp. 
Sci. Prince Albert I, Monaco 55:1-77, 5 pis. 
Jordan, D. S., and B. M. Davis. 1892. A pre- 
liminary review of the apodal fishes or eels 
inhabiting the waters of America and Eu- 
rope. U. S. Fish Comm. Rept. for 1888, 
16:581-677, pis. 73-79. 
— and B. W. Evermann. 1896. The 
fishes of North and Middle America. Bull. 
U. S. Natl. Mus. 47, vol. 1, lx -f- 954 pp. 
and J. O. Snyder. 1901. A review of 
the apodal fishes or eels of Japan, with de- 
scriptions of nineteen new species. Proc. 
U. S. Natl. Mus. 23:837-890, 22 figs. 
Jungersen, H. F. E. 1910. Ichthyotomical 
contributions II. The structure of the Au- 
lostomidae, Syngnathidae and Solenostomi- 
dae. Mem. l’Acad. Roy. Sci. Lett. Danemark, 
Ser. 7, 8:269-363, 7 pis. 
Kampf, W.-D. 1961. Vergleichende funktions- 
morphologische Untersuchungen an den Vis- 
cerocranien einiger rauberisch lebender 
Knochenfische. Zool. Beit. 6:391-496, 48 
figs. 
Kirchhoff, H. 1958. Funktionell-anatomische 
Untersuchung des Visceralapparates von 
Clupea harengus L. Zool. Jahrb. (Anat.) 
76:461-540, 63 figs. 
Myers, G. S., and M. H. Storey. 1939- Hes- 
peromyrus fryi, a new genus and species of 
echelid eels from California. Stanford Ich- 
thyol. Bull. 1:156-159, 1 fig. 
and C. B. Wade. 1941. Four new 
genera and ten new species of eels from the 
Pacific coast of Tropical America. Allan Han- 
cock Pacific Expeds. 9:65-69, pis. 7-16. 
Nelson, G. J. 1966. Osteology and relation- 
ships of the eel Neenchelys buitendijki. Co- 
peia (in press). 
Norman, J. R. 1926. The development of the 
chondrocranium of the eel ( Anguilla vul- 
