10571 Barringtonia eAJL-jefc- - o . <? 
10575 Ficus _ „ 
77 Molanolepia nu 1 t Igland ulo s a Rohb.XX & Zoll. 
78 Fischocarpus 
10580 Claoxylon 
10582 Pittpsporum ferrugineum Ait. 
10584 Indiaofera hirsuta L. 
ICAQ4W L'elothrla ? 
86 I ipturus 
10594 Gomphandra 
95 (Anon) fls will be needed 
970, Psychotria »■■■ >it<- via. 
___0 all received to data except the orch- 
ids,? in number, sent to Williams for direct 
report. 
These are , of course , merely sight identifications. I am 
pretty sure of the correctness of the identifications as far as 
made. Naturally intensive study should be deferred until more material ✓ 
becomes available. 
I wonder how many more permutations and combinations the collector 
will originate ? The "bis” numbers and the lettered numbers will * 
make it very difficult to maintain a working number list, because one 
never knows how much ,T apace" to leave in preliminary lists. Too bad, 
also, that they elected to shart a new number series with the New Guinea 
material, duplicating the Philipp ine-Borneo-Indo-China series, for 
this will cause endless confusion in the future, just as in the 
past; for we still note Cuming numbers from Polynesia ( his 
first collections) cited as Philippine . And if you ever used Henry 
numbers and Zollinger numbers where the lettering is worked over- 
time, you would have to be omnipitent to determine just what is 
meant by this or thad addition l Ho hum . Koelz did. it for one of 
his collections from northern India, sometimes running through the 
entire alphabet for a single number. I th ink that here the use of 
letters all indicated the same locality or perhaps merely the same 
habitat 
