10571 Barringtonia .V ){*$*,. 
76bis Senecarpus f\,S&lk- 
77 Helanolopia multiglandulosa Robb .3d & Zoll. 
78 KIschocarpus 
10580 Claoxylon 
10582 Pittpsporum ferrugineum Ait. 
10584 Indigofera hirsuta L. 
85 Sterculia 
86 Pip turns 
87 
88 
89 
10590 
92 
93 
(Acant . ) 
Elatontenatcu^Sw- u 
Heliconia ? 
- . 
10594 Gomphandra 
95 (Anon) fls will be needed 
97Q, Psychotria r? '~ c ^‘ l "n-t-t- rji. 
- — 0 all received to data except the orch- 
ids,? in number, sent to Williams for direct 
report. 
These are ,of course , merely sight identifications. I am 
pretty sure of the correctness of the identifications as far as 
made. Naturally intensive study should be deferred until more material ✓ 
becomes available. 
I wonder- how many more permutations and combinations the collector 
will originate ? The "bis” numbers and the lettered numbers will * 
make it very difficult to maintain a working number list, because one 
never knows how much "apace" to leave in preliminary lists. Too bad, 
also, that they elected to start a new number series with the New Guinea 
material, duplicating the Philipp ine-Borneo-Indo-China series, for 
this will cause endless confusion in the future, just as in the 
past; for we still note Cuming numbers from Polynesia ( his 
first collections) cited as Philippine . And if you ever used Henry 
numbers and Zollinger numbers where the lettering is worked over- 
time, you would have to be omnipitent to determine just what is 
meant by this or thad addition l Ho hum . Hoelz did it for one of 
his collections from northern India, sometimes running through the 
entire alphabet for a single number. I think that here the use of 
letters all indicated the same locality or perhaps merely the same 
habitat 
